[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

弹箭与制导学报 >

2023 , Vol. 43 >Issue 6: 8 - 13

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2023.06.002

数值模拟研究屏蔽板厚度对杆式射流冲击屏蔽炸药过程的影响

  • 蒋文灿 1 ,
  • 傅丹 2 ,
  • 梁斌 1 ,
  • 卢永刚 1
展开
  • 1 中国工程物理研究院总体工程研究所,四川 绵阳 621999
  • 2 火箭军装备部装备项目管理中心,北京 100085
卢永刚(1973—),男,研究员,研究方向:战斗部终点效应、弹药毁伤评估。

蒋文灿(1990—),男,博士研究生,研究方向:战斗部毁伤。

收稿日期: 2023-05-04

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-30

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(11672278)

收起

Numerical Investigation on the Initiation Mechanism of Covered Charge with Variable Thickness Shell Impacted by Rod Jet

  • JIANG Wencan 1 ,
  • FU Dan 2 ,
  • LIANG Bin 1 ,
  • LU Yonggang 1
Expand
  • 1 Institute of Systems Engineering,China Academy of Engineering Physics,Mianyang 621999,Sichuan,China
  • 2 Project Management Center of PLA Rocket Force Equipment Department,Beijing 100085,China

Received date: 2023-05-04

  Online published: 2024-12-30

Fold

摘要

为研究屏蔽板厚度变化对杆式射流冲击起爆屏蔽炸药的影响,采用任意拉格朗日-欧拉(arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian,ALE)流固耦合算法,对屏蔽板厚度变化时K型装药形成的聚能杆式射流(射流头部速度6 556 m·s-1)冲击起爆屏蔽炸药过程进行了数值模拟计算研究。研究结果表明,随着屏蔽板厚度逐渐增大,屏蔽炸药的起爆方式由前驱冲击波和压缩波起爆方式转变为射流冲击起爆方式,转折点屏蔽板厚度为1.4D(D为装药口径)。当屏蔽板厚度超过3.1D时,射流已经不能使屏蔽炸药起爆。对于厚壁装药,随着屏蔽板厚度增加,射流冲击屏蔽板产生的前驱冲击波可能无法起爆屏蔽炸药,起爆方式转变为射流直接侵彻起爆屏蔽炸药,并且厚壁装药下屏蔽板的厚度将对屏蔽炸药的冲击起爆距离产生明显影响,随着屏蔽板厚度增加,冲击起爆距离明显增大。

关键词： K型装药; 杆式射流; 冲击起爆; 屏蔽炸药; 前驱波

本文引用格式

蒋文灿 , 傅丹 , 梁斌 , 卢永刚 . 数值模拟研究屏蔽板厚度对杆式射流冲击屏蔽炸药过程的影响[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2023 , 43(6) : 8 -13 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2023.06.002

Abstract

Based on the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) fluid structure coupling algorithm, the initiation mechanism of covered charge with variable thickness shell impacted by a rod jet (the head velocity of the jet is 6 556 m·s-1) is studied. The results show that with the increasing of the thickness of the shell, the initiation mechanism of the covered charge changes from the preshock wave and compressional wave initiation mode to the jet directly impact initiation mode. The shell of the covered charge thickness is 1.4D(D is the caliber of charge). When the thickness of the covered charge exceeds 3.1D, the jet fails to initiate detonation of the covered charge. For thick-walled charges, as the thickness of the covered plate increases, the precursor shock wave generated by the jet impacting the covered plate may fail to initiate detonation of the shielding explosive, resulting in a change in detonation mode to direct penetration of the jet for initiating detonation. Additionally, variations in thickness of the covered plate significantly affect impact initiation distance for thick-walled charges with respect to covered charge.

Key words： K-charge; rod jet; impact initiation; covered charge; preshock

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
HELD M. Time distance diagram of the jet initation of covered high explosive charges[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(4): 702-707.

[2]
HELD M. Jet initiation of covered high explosives with different materials[J]. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 2002, 27(2): 88-93.

[3]
HUSSAIN T, LIU Y, HUANG F, et al. Preshock desensitization phenomena during initiation of covered heterogeneous explosives by shaped charge jets[J]. Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 34(2): 152-169.

[4]
CHEN S M, JIA X, XIA M, et al. Critical initiation threshold of covered finite thickness explosive under impact of shaped charge jet[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2021, 46(10): 1572-1580.

[5]
ARNOLD W, ROTTENKOLBER E. High explosive initiation behavior by shaped charge jet impacts[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 58: 184-193.

[6]
HELD M. Experiments of initiation of covered, but unconfined high explosive charges by means of shaped charge jets[J]. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 1987, 12(2): 35-40.

[7]
MADER C L. Modeling shock desensitization of composition B explosive[J]. Journal of Energetic Materials, 2014, 59(1): 502-515.

[8]
CHEN S M, JIA X, XIA M, et al. Critical initiation threshold of covered finite thickness explosive under impact of shaped charge jet[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2021, 46(10): 1572-1580.

[9]
WANG H X, WANG H, CHEN Z G, et al. Application of uniform design in jet projectile charges detonation insensitive explosives[C]// IEEE. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems. New York: IEEE, 2017: 373-378.

[10]
赵聘, 陈朗, 李金河, 等. 聚能射流侵彻隔板形成的前驱冲击波起爆不同温度炸药特性[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55.

DOI

ZHAO P, CHEN L, LI J H, et al. The characteristics of explosives initiated by precursor shock waves in shaped charge jet penetrating a bulk head at different temperatures[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(1): 45-55.

[11]
陈思敏, 黄正祥, 贾鑫, 等. 射流冲击盖板覆盖下有限厚炸药的仿真和试验研究[J]. 含能材料, 2021, 29(2): 114-123.

CHEN S M, HUANG Z X, JIA X, et al. Simulation and experimental study of jet impacton covered finite-thickness explosive[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021, 29(2): 114-123.

[12]
宋乙丹, 陈科全, 路中华, 等. 聚能射流冲击起爆屏蔽压装PBX炸药的试验研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2019, 42(1): 69-78.

DOI

SONG Y D, Chen K Q, LU Z H, et al. Experimental research of the impact initiation of shelled pressed PBX explosives by shaped charge jet[J]. Chinese Journal of Explosive & Propellants, 2019, 42(1): 69-78.

[13]
康浩博, 蒋建伟, 彭嘉诚, 等. 杆式弹对厚壁壳体装药冲击起爆机制模拟分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(1): 87-98.

KANG H B, JIANG J W, PENG J C, et al, Simulation analysis on the initiation mechanism of the explosive chargecovered with a thick shell impacted by a rod projectile[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 87-98.

[14]
杨丽, 陈闯, 张健, 等. 带隔板装药的杆式射流成型试验及侵彻特性分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(4): 621-626.

DOI

YANG L, CHEN C, ZHANG J, et al. Analysis of formation experiment and penetration property of rod-like jet of shaped charge with foam[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(4): 621-626.

DOI

[15]
Л. П. 奥尔连科. 爆炸物理学[M]. 孙承纬, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.

OPJIEHKO Л. П.. Explosive physics[M]. SUN C W, translate. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.

[16]
樊雪飞, 李伟兵, 王晓鸣, 等. 装药爆轰控制结构参数对双模毁伤元的影响[J]. 含能材料, 2016, 24(8): 735-741.

FAN X F, LI W B, WANG X M, et al. Effects of charge detonation control structure parameters on dual mode damage element[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 24(8): 735-741.

[17]
LU J P, LOCHERT I, KENNEDY D L. Simulation of sympathetic reaction tests for PBXN-109[C]// IBS. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Detonation. New York: ISB, 2006: 1338-1349.

[18]
JOHNSON R, COOK W K. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains high strain rates and high temperatures[C]// IBS. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. Reston: ISB, 1983: 1120-1135.

[19]
梁斌, 余春祥, 聂源, 等. 不同口径聚能装药射流引爆带壳装药数值模拟[J]. 成都大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(3): 310-317.

LIANG B, YU C X, NIE Y, et al. Numerical simulation of different caliber shaped charge jet initiating different thickness shelled explosive[J]. Journal of Chengdu University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 40(3): 310-317.

[20]
VARAS D, ZAERA R, PUENTE J L. Numerical modelling of the hydrodynamic ram phenomenon[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(3): 363-374.

[21]
SUTHERLAND G. Effect of test method on pop plot results[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1426(1): 295-298.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]