导弹与制导技术

CFD/CSD与机弹分离的耦合模拟技术

  • 王芳 ,
  • 龚军锋
展开
  • 1 西北工业大学无人机研究所,西安 710065
    2 西安爱生技术集团公司,西安 710065

王芳(1981-),女,陕西西安人,工程师,硕士,研究方向:飞行器设计。

收稿日期: 2013-02-22

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-26

CFD/CSD and Missile Separation Integrative Simulation Method

  • WANG Fang ,
  • GONG Junfeng
Expand
  • 1 Institute of UAV, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710065, China
    2 Xi'an ASN Technology Group Co. Ltd, Xi'an 710065, China

Received date: 2013-02-22

  Online published: 2025-05-26

摘要

机弹分离模拟的刚性模型不能反映机翼弹性变形的影响。在分别建立并验证的CFD/CSD气弹模拟方法和机弹分离模拟方法的基础上,通过流场网格更新环节同时反映机翼结构的变形运动和弹体的六自由度运动对流场的相互影响。CFD与CSD的求解方法可计及真实飞行器流场的非线性和结构的非线性。基于各主控方程的时间域积分,交错时间推进获得整个耦合系统的响应,建立了一套CFD/CSD与机弹分离耦合求解的时域仿真系统。

本文引用格式

王芳 , 龚军锋 . CFD/CSD与机弹分离的耦合模拟技术[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2013 , 33(6) : 193 -196 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2013.06.016

Abstract

Using rigid model in missile separate simulation can not embody the influence of wing's elastic deformation. In this paper, the loose CFD/CSD algorithm of aeroelasticity was established and validated, then AEDC wind tunnel test model was computed. The result of solution conforms with the wind tunnel test result. Through flow-field dynamic mesh updating, the wing's deformation and the missile's 6-dof movement were simultaneity considered. In this method, the aircraft's flow-field nonlinear and structural nonlinear were considered. Time-marching simulation's method was applied in CSD, CFD and 6-dof Newton Euler solver, then the whole coupling system's response was obtained.

参考文献

[1]
Monique L Purdon, Chris F Hetreed, Dr Mary L, et al. F-35 Pre-flight store separation analyses: Innovative techniques for affordability[R]. 2009.
[2]
钱锟, 孔维梁. F-35武器系统和载荷分离试验的预先研究[J]. 国际航空, 2009 (12): 64- 68.
[3]
曾宪昂, 徐敏, 安效民, 等. 基于CFD/CSD 耦合算法的机翼颤振分析[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2008, 26 (1): 79- 82.
[4]
龚军锋, 祝小平, 周洲. 小型察打无人机投弹非稳态干扰下六自由度仿真[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2012, 32 (3): 31- 34.
[5]
Lesoinne M, Farhat C. Geometric conservation laws for aero-elastic computations using unstruetured dynamic meshes,AIAA95-1709 R. 1995.
[6]
Goura GSL, Badcock KJ, Woodgate M A, et al. Transformation methods for the time marching analysis of flutter,ΑΙΑΑ 2001 – 2457 [R]. 2001.
[7]
Goura GSL, Badcock KJ, et al. A data exchange method for fluid-structure interaction problems[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2001, 105: 215- 221.
[8]
Yates E C. AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response I-Wing 445.6, AGARD Report 765 [R]. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 1988.
[9]
Fox John H. Generic wing, Pylon, and Moving Finned Store, ADP010735 R. 2000.
文章导航

/