[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

四旋翼前飞模态的频域辨识建模与控制器设计

  • 郭凯阳 1, 2 ,
  • 林德福 1, 2 ,
  • 杨丹 3 ,
  • 张意 4 ,
  • 刘叙含 4 ,
  • 王辉 1, 2
展开
  • 1 北京理工大学宇航学院,北京 100081
  • 2 北京理工大学无人自主控制技术实验室,北京 100081
  • 3 西南计算机有限责任公司技术中心,重庆 400060
  • 4 西安现代控制技术研究所,西安 710065

郭凯阳(1996—),男,河北张家口人,硕士研究生,研究方向:飞行器总体设计。

收稿日期: 2021-12-16

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(U61827901)

Frequency-domain Identification Modeling and Control Design of a Quadrotor in Forward Flight

  • GUO Kaiyang 1, 2 ,
  • LIN Defu 1, 2 ,
  • YANG Dan 3 ,
  • ZHANG Yi 4 ,
  • LIU Xuhan 4 ,
  • WANG Hui 1, 2
Expand
  • 1 School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of UAV Autonomous Control, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3 Technology Center, Southwest Computer Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400060, China
  • 4 Xi’an Modern Control Technology Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, China

Received date: 2021-12-16

  Online published: 2025-02-03

摘要

由于四旋翼在前飞模态下的动力学特性与参数同悬停时存在明显差异,导致现有的基于悬停点设计的控制器性能难以满足机动任务中快速性和稳定性的要求,同时还缺少具备理论支撑的参数整定方法。针对这些问题,提出了一种适用于四旋翼前飞模态的频域辨识建模和控制器设计方法,通过频域系统辨识原理和实验,建立较为精确的前飞动力学模型,并结合极点配置法,形成一套姿态控制的内外环整体设计方案,从频域分析角度得到PID参数的解析表达式和整定结果。仿真和实验结果表明,基于频域辨识得到的前飞动力学模型进行极点配置设计姿态控制器,其响应速度较快,系统稳定性较强,信号跟踪准确,控制性能优于常规基于悬停模态手动调参的控制器。

本文引用格式

郭凯阳 , 林德福 , 杨丹 , 张意 , 刘叙含 , 王辉 . 四旋翼前飞模态的频域辨识建模与控制器设计[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2022 , 42(3) : 16 -23 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2022.03.004

Abstract

Both characteristics and parameters of quadrotor dynamics in forward flight are different from that in hovering, generating that the controller performance designed at hovering equilibrium is difficult to meet the rapidity and stability requirements in maneuvering missions. Meanwhile, there is also a lack of parameters tuning methods with theoretical support. Aiming at these problems, the paper proposes a frequency-domain identification modeling and control design method for a quadrotor in forward-flight state. The accurate forward dynamics is modeled based on the principles and experiments of frequency-domain system identification. Then combining the pole placement with frequency-domain analysis, an attitude control design scheme for the overall loop is introduced to derive the analytical expressions and tuning results of PID controller. The numerical simulations and flight experiments are carried out to demonstrate the strong stability and well transient behavior of the proposed work, and it can track the desired instructions accurately. In general, its control performance is better than conventional controllers, which are designed and tuned manually in hovering state.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
PINES D J, BOHORQUEZ F. Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(2): 290-305.

[2]
BRISTEAU P J, MARTIN P, SALAUN E, et al. The role of propeller aerodynamics in the model of a quadrotor UAV[C]// ECC. Proceedings of the 2019 European Control Conference. New York: IEEE, 2019: 23-26.

[3]
BARCELOS D, KOLAEI A, BRAMESFELD G. Aerodynamic interactions of quadrotor configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft 2020, 57(1): 1-17.

[4]
TISCHLER M, REMPLE R. Aircraft and rotorcraft system identification[M]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.

[5]
LI J, LI Y T. Dynamic analysis and pid control for a quadrotor[C]// IEEE. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. New York: IEEE, 2011: 573-578.

[6]
ZUBOWICZ T, ARMINSKI K, KUSALEWICZ A. Quadrotor flight controller design using classical tools[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2020, 18: 730-738.

[7]
BOUABDALLAH S, NORTH A, SIEGWART R. PID vs LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor[C]// IEEE. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Intelligent Robots Systems. New York: IEEE, 2004: 2451-2456.

[8]
BOLANDI H, REZAEI M, MOHSENIPOUR R, et al. Attitude control of a quadrotor with optimized pid controller[J]. Intelligent Control and Automation, 2013, 4: 335-342.

[9]
MANZOOR T, XIA Y Q, ZHAI D H, et al. Trajectory tracking control of a VTOL unmanned aerial vehicle using offset-free tracking MPC[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(7): 2024-2042.

[10]
TANG P, LIN D, ZHENG D, et al. Observer based finite-time fault tolerant quadrotor attitude control with actuator faults[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 104: 105968.

[11]
于怿男, 梁熠, 宋韬, 等. 基于模型拼接技术的四旋翼无人机全飞行包线建模[J]. 航空学报, 2020(增刊2):192-201.

[12]
YU Y N, TANG P, SONG T, et al. A two-step method for system identification of low-cost quadrotor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 96: 105551.

[13]
全权. 多旋翼飞行器设计与控制[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2018.

[14]
马静囡, 程惠能, 赵颖娟, 等. 基于X运动系统四轴水下作业平台的设计与制作[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2021, 41(3):31-33.

[15]
WEN Q Q, XIA Q L, ZUO T T. Analysis and design for missile of three-loop autopilot[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2012, 21(2): 172-178.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]