罩顶药高对有隔板聚能装药的影响
收稿日期: 2012-03-18
网络出版日期: 2025-05-26
The Influence of Apical Charge Height on Shaped Charge with Waveshaper
Received date: 2012-03-18
Online published: 2025-05-26
为了得到最佳罩顶药高,提高聚能装药的破甲威力,设计了7种不同罩顶药高的装药结构,利用有限元软件LS-DYNA对主药柱中的爆轰波传播、射流形成及侵彻靶板过程进行了数值模拟,并与静破甲试验结果进行了比较。随着罩顶药高的增加,侵彻深度呈现出先增加后减小的趋势。因此每种聚能装药结构均存在一个最佳罩顶药高,对于文中数值模拟及试验的装药结构,当药型罩锥角为60°时,最佳罩顶药高为22.5mm。最佳罩顶药高随着锥角的增加而增加,设最佳罩顶药高H₁(opt)=yD。,当锥角a在45°~70°范围内时,y满足拟合得到的多项式:y=1.013–0.0497α+9.63×10¯⁴a²–5.29×10-α³。
付建平 , 陈智刚 , 侯秀成 , 刘汉卿 , 郭光全 . 罩顶药高对有隔板聚能装药的影响[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2013 , 33(6) : 70 -73 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2013.06.030
In order to get optimal apical charge height for better penetration of the shaped charge(SC) with waveshaper, seven different shaped charges were designed. Compared to three rounds of static penetration experiments, the finite-element code LS-DYNA was used to do the numerical simulation on the detonation wave propagation in the main charge, jet formation and penetrating into RHA target. The result shows that with the apical charge height in the SC increasing, the penetration depth first increases and then decreases and there is an optimum apical charge height in every definite SC. The conclusion is that while liner angle is 60°, the optimum is 22.5mm and with liner angle increasing, the optimum of apical charge height will increase gradually.
Key words: shaped charge; waveshaper; liner; jet formation
| [1] | Sachdeva S S, Bhattacharyya A, Kishore P, et al. Study on some aspects of performance of hollow charge[C]//17th International Symposium on Ballistics. Midrand, South Africa, 1998, Vol II: 299-306. |
| [2] | 汤明钧, 杨权中, 阎秀华. 破甲弹中爆轰波相互作用的初步研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报:自然科学版, 1979(1): 145-156. |
| [3] | 高尔新, 李建平, 李景云. 带壳有隔板聚能装药的实验研究. 爆炸与冲击, 1996, 16(2): 166–170. |
| [4] | 李如江, 张晋红, 王建波. 隔板对聚能射流性能影响的数值模拟[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2012, 32(3): 107–110. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |