[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
弹药技术

爆炸荷载作用下拱形结构的动力响应分析

  • 冷冰林 ,
  • 许金余 ,
  • 段吉祥 ,
  • 徐杰
展开
  • 1 195080 部队,广东汕头 515800
    2 中国航空港建设第九工程总队,上海 201105
    3 空军工程大学工程学院,西安 710038
    4 南京军区空军勘察设计院,南京 210007
    5 95538部队,四川新津 611430

冷冰林(1984-),男,四川泸州人,硕士,研究方向:防护工程。

收稿日期: 2009-05-16

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(10372084)资助

The Analysis of Arch Structure Subjected to Blast Loading

  • LENG Binglin ,
  • XU Jinyu ,
  • DUAN Jixiang ,
  • XU Jie
Expand
  • 1 No. 95080 Unit, Guangdong Shantou 515800, China
    2 The 9th Engineering Corps, China Airport Construction Group Corporation, Shanghai 201105, China
    3 The Engineering Institute, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China
    4 Air Force Survery and Design Institute, Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing 210007, China
    5 No. 95538 Unit, Sichuan Xinjin 611430, China

Received date: 2009-05-16

  Online published: 2025-05-28

摘要

为了比较三种不同材料拱形结构的抗爆炸性能,利用ANSYS/LS-DYNA3D有限元软件,采用流固耦合算法,对拱形结构在内部爆炸载荷作用下的爆腔形成和发展规律等动力响应问题进行了数值模拟。结果表明:RPC拱形结构的单元较钢纤维和岩石拱形结构的单元能承受更大的主应力,其单元具有更强的能力吸收爆炸所释放的能量,因而RPC拱形结构具有更高的防震塌能力以及结构的完整性。

本文引用格式

冷冰林 , 许金余 , 段吉祥 , 徐杰 . 爆炸荷载作用下拱形结构的动力响应分析[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2010 , 30(3) : 59 -62 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2010.03.046

Abstract

For comparing the anti-explosion performance of three different material arc structures, the corresponding numerical simulation was conducted by using element program LS-DYNA3D. The arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) algorithm was used to simulate the dynamical matter, such as the forming process and development disciplinarian of explosive cavity. According to simulation, the propagation of the stress wave and the influences of soil layer were studied, the size of blast pit, the damage form, stress contour, pressure time curve and energy time in three different material arc structures were comparatively analyzed. The research shows that the RPC arc structure element can endure more principal stress, so it holds the stronger capability to absorb the energy from explosion, thus the RPC arc structures possess the predominant capability of the prevent collapse and integrality of the structure.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1]
Hao H, Cheong H K, Cui S J. Numerical study of dynamic buckling of steel columns subjected to underground explosion[J]. Journal of Key Engineering Materials, 2002, 233-236: 211-216.
[2]
Cui S J, Cheong H K, Hao H. Elastic plastic dynamic response and buckling of steel columns under ground strong vertical ground motion[J]. Journal of Key Engineering Materials, 2002, 233-236: 217-222.
[3]
Fatt M S H, Ouyang X, Dinan R J. Blast response of walls retrofitted with elastomer coatings[G]// Structures under Shock & Impact VIII, 2004, 15: 129-138.
[4]
Pandey A K, Ram K, Paul D K, et al. Non-linear response of reinforced concrete containment structure under blast loading[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2006, 236(9): 993-1002.
[5]
尚小江, 苏建宇. ANSYS/LS-DYNA 动力分析方法与工程实例[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005.
[6]
董香永, 夏昌平, 段祝平. 平面爆炸波在半无限混凝土介质中传播与衰减特性的数值分析[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(2): 60-65.
[7]
蔡洪亮. 动能弹对混凝土靶侵彻规律研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2006.
[8]
白金泽. LS-DYNA3D 理论基础与实例分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
[9]
王成, 付晓磊, 宁建国. 柱形装药爆炸破坏混凝土的数值模拟分析[J]. 计算力学学报, 2007, 24(3): 318-322.
[10]
戴俊. 柱状装药爆破的岩石压碎圈与裂隙圈计算[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 20(4): 144-147.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]