[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
弹药技术

不同跨度地下洞室弹体侵彻效应数值模拟研究

  • 刘绍鎏 ,
  • 孙惠香 ,
  • 王晓龙 ,
  • 张悦 ,
  • 黄文文 ,
  • 康婷 ,
  • 张玺
展开
  • 1 空军工程大学, 西安 710038
    2 94900部队, 福建漳州 363000
    3 93199部队, 哈尔滨 150001

刘绍鎏(1991-),男,江西南昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向:结构工程与防护工程。

收稿日期: 2016-11-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51208506;51308540)

Research on the Numerical Simulation of Penetration Effect ofUnderground Cavity with Different Spans

  • LIU Shaoliu ,
  • SUN Huixiang ,
  • WANG Xiaolong ,
  • ZHANG Yue ,
  • HUANG Wenwen ,
  • KANG Ting ,
  • ZHANG Xi
Expand
  • 1 Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, China
    2 No.94900 Unit, Fujian Zhangzhou 363000, China
    3 No.93199 Unit, Harbin 150001, China

Received date: 2016-11-25

  Online published: 2025-05-28

摘要

为了研究不同跨度地下洞室的动力响应特性,选用小直径炸弹,应用ANSYS/LS-DYNA有限元程序,对弹体垂直侵彻地下洞室进行了数值模拟,得到的侵彻深度与经验公式计算深度数值相近。研究结果表明:洞室埋深为5m时,拱顶处受力最大,14m以下小跨度洞室拱脚部位受力较大,24m以上大跨度洞室拱肩部位受力较大;洞室埋深为10m时,拱脚部位受力较大,位移响应最为剧烈,这些部位为结构的薄弱环节,在设计中应采取加强措施。

本文引用格式

刘绍鎏 , 孙惠香 , 王晓龙 , 张悦 , 黄文文 , 康婷 , 张玺 . 不同跨度地下洞室弹体侵彻效应数值模拟研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2017 , 37(4) : 51 -54 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2017.04.012

Abstract

In order to research the dynamic response characteristics of underground cavity with different spans, numerical simulation of the vertical penetration of the projectile into the underground cavity was carried out by adopting small diameter bomb(SDB) and using ANSYS/ LS-DYNA finite element program. The abtained penetration depth was similar to the depth calculated by emprical formula. The research results showed that when the depth of the underground cavern was 5 meters, the stress at the vault was the largest, and the stress at cavity arch with small span(below 14 meters) was larger, while the stress at cavity spandrel with big span (above 24 meters) was larger. When the depth of the underground cavern was 10 meters, the stress at arch springing was large, the displacement response was the most severe. These parts were the weakness of structure, therefore strengthening measures should be taken in design.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1]
任辉启, 穆朝民, 刘瑞朝,等. 精确制导武器侵彻效应与工程防护[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016:1-41.
[2]
GOLD V M. Analysis of the penetration resistance of con-crete:AD-A329 140 [R]. S. l.:s.n.], 2000.
[3]
WARREN T L, FOSSUMA F, FREW D J. Penetration intolow-strength (23 MPa) concrete: target characterization and simulations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(5):447-503.
[4]
郑振华, 余文力, 王涛. 钻地弹侵彻高强度混凝土靶的数值模拟[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2008, 28(3):143-446.
[5]
徐干成, 顾金才, 张向阳,等. 地下洞库围岩外加固抗炸弹侵彻性能研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(10):2064-2070.
[6]
石少卿, 康建功, 汪敏,等. ANSYS/LS-DYNA 在爆炸与冲击领域内的工程应用[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011: 82-88.
[7]
孙惠香, 许金余, 朱国富,等. 爆炸作用下跨度对地下结构破坏形态的影响[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2013, 14(2):90-94.
[8]
沈俊, 刘瑞朝, 杨建超,等. 弹体侵彻岩体效应试验与理论研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(5):946-952.
[9]
孙惠香, 许金余, 李庆. 爆炸荷载作用下地下结构破坏模式研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2011, 31(5):89-92.
[10]
吴祥云. 细长弹侵彻防护工程材料靶体的试验和理论研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2002.
[11]
PATTERSON W, BATY RS. 两个经验公式与现场试验结果的比较[C]//第十一届武器效应与结构相互作用国际专题讨论会文集.洛阳: 总参工程兵科研三所, 2003: 465-468.
[12]
张德志, 林俊德, 唐润棣,等. 高强度岩石侵彻经验公式[J]. 兵工学报, 2006, 27(1): 15-18.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]