[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

不同构型射流稳焰燃烧室的冷态数值研究

  • 任冠龙 1, 2 ,
  • 孙海俊 1, 2 ,
  • 田乐 1, 2 ,
  • 徐义华 1, 2
展开
  • 1 南昌航空大学飞行器工程学院,南昌 330063
  • 2 江西省微小航空发动机重点实验室,南昌 330063

任冠龙(1999—),男,河南郑州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:航空宇航推进理论与工程。

收稿日期: 2021-08-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(12102161)

航空科学基金(20200001056001)

江西省微小航空发动机重点实验室开放基金(Ef202006073)

南昌航空大学研究生创新专项资金(YC2021047)

Numerical Study on the Flow Characteristics of Jet-stabilized Combustor with Different Configurations

  • REN Guanlong 1, 2 ,
  • SUN Haijun 1, 2 ,
  • TIAN Le 1, 2 ,
  • XU Yihua 1, 2
Expand
  • 1 School of Aircraft Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
  • 2 Micro Aero-engine Key Laboratory of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330063, China

Received date: 2021-08-30

  Online published: 2025-05-29

摘要

为探究不同构型对射流稳焰燃烧室冷态流动特性的影响,文中在原有燃烧室构型的基础上提出了3种不同组合构型的射流稳焰燃烧室。首先对燃烧室模型进行网格无关性验证,确定最终数值模拟的网格数量,在此基础上对4种构型射流稳焰燃烧室进行冷态模拟研究,从速度流线、涡结构、湍动能分布、气相掺混度以及丙烷质量分数5个方面来分析模拟结果。研究结果表明:除构型3外,其余3种构型均能形成3对旋涡,分别位于燃料喷口处、空气射流孔的左侧以及燃烧室下游,其中构型2的旋涡结构较为独立,边界比较清晰。燃烧室主燃区(0~0.06 m)内,构型2的湍动能最大,丙烷质量分数最小,气相掺混度最高,表明该几何模型更有利于燃料与空气的掺混。燃烧室下游(0.06~0.40 m),4种构型的丙烷质量分数均比主燃区内低。

本文引用格式

任冠龙 , 孙海俊 , 田乐 , 徐义华 . 不同构型射流稳焰燃烧室的冷态数值研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2022 , 42(2) : 1 -6 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2022.02.001

Abstract

In order to explore the cold flow characteristics of different configurations of jet-stabilized combustor, three combustor geometries are proposed on the basis of original geometry. First, the grid independence of the combustors is verified to determine the grid number for the final numerical simulation. On this basis, the cold simulations of four combustor geometries are carried out. The numerical results are analyzed from five aspects:velocity streamline, vortex structure, turbulent kinetic energy distribution, gas mixing degrees and propane mass fraction. The results show that except geometry 3, the other three combustor geometries could be form three pairs of vortices, which were separately located at the fuel jet hole, the left side of the air jet hole and the combustor downstream. The vortex structure of combustor geometry 2 was relatively independent and the boundary was relatively clear. In the combustor primary zone (0~0.06 m), the turbulent kinetic energy of geometry 2 was the largest, the mass fraction of propane was the smallest, and the gas mixing degrees was the highest, indicating that the geometric model was beneficial for the mixing of fuel and air. Downstream of the combustor (0.06~0.40 m), the mass fraction of propane in the four configurations was lower than that in the combustor primary zone.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
BAUER H J, EIGENMANN L, SCHERRER B, et al. Local measurements in a three dimensional jet-stabilized model combustor: 95-GT-71[R]. New York: ASME, 1995.

[2]
KURRECK M, WILLMANN M, WITTIG S. Prediction of the three-dimensional reacting two-phase flow within a jet-stabilized combustor[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines & Power, 1998, 120(1): 77-83.

[3]
KLOSE G, SCHMEHL R, MEIER R, et al. Evaluation of advanced two-phase flow combustion models for predicting low emission combustors[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines & Power, 2001, 123(4): 817-823.

[4]
BAZDIDI T F, ZEINIVAND H. Presumed PDF modeling of reactive two-phase flow in a three dimensional jet-stabilized model combustor[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(1): 225-234.

[5]
ZEINIVAND H, BAZDIDI T F. Influence of stabilizer jets on combustion characteristics and NOx emission in a jet-stabilized combustor[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 92: 348-360.

[6]
YANG X, HE Z H, QIU P H, et al. Numerical investigations on combustion and emission characteristics of a novel elliptical jet-stabilized model combustor[J]. Energy, 2019, 170(1): 1082-1097.

[7]
SUN H J, YAN P H, XU Y H. Numerical simulation on hydrogen combustion and flow characteristics of a jet-stabilized combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(22): 12604-12615.

[8]
翟小飞, 白菡尘, 李春. 超声速气流中液体横向射流雾化过程数值模拟[J]. 气体物理, 2021, 6(3):23-29.

[9]
田佳莹, 曾卓雄, 徐义华, 等. 双凹腔AVC冷态流动特性研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2015, 35(6):87-90.

DOI

[10]
何小民, 许金生, 苏俊卿. 驻涡区进口结构参数影响TVC燃烧性能的试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(11):1798-1802.

[11]
刘世青, 钟兢军. 驻涡燃烧室后驻体形状选择冷态数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2010, 31(9):1480-1483.

[12]
曾卓雄, 张永祺, 张龙. 旋流对驻涡燃烧室湍流流动的影响[J]. 热科学与技术, 2020, 19(2):41-47.

[13]
聂弘毅. 旋流喷嘴射流雾化过程的数值模拟[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2020.

[14]
金义, 何小民, 彭春梅, 等. 驻涡燃烧室驻涡区三维冷态流动特性数值研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 46(2):272-279.

[15]
邢菲, 孟祥泰, 李继保, 等. 凹腔双驻涡稳焰冷态流场初步研究[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29(2):135-138.

[16]
陈斌斌, 夏智勋, 王德全, 等. 固冲发动机补燃室掺混过程评估方法研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2013, 36(6):731-735.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]