弹道与气动力技术

几种翼型参数化方法研究

  • 廖炎平 ,
  • 刘莉 ,
  • 龙腾
展开
  • 北京理工大学宇航学院,北京 100081

廖炎平(1985-),男,湖南临澧人,博士研究生,研究方向:飞行器总体设计。

收稿日期: 2010-08-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-30

The Research on Some Parameterized Methods for Airfoil

  • LIAO Yanping ,
  • LIU Li ,
  • LONG Teng
Expand
  • School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081,China

Received date: 2010-08-09

  Online published: 2025-05-30

摘要

文中研究了形函数线性扰动法、特征参数描述法、正交基函数法和CST方法这几种翼型参数化方法,对比了这几种翼型参数化方法用于对称翼型、弯度翼型和超临界翼型的拟合精度,拟合结果表明CST方法的拟合精度优于其他几种翼型参数化方法。建立了这几种翼型参数化方法的气动分析模型,采用拉丁超方试验设计方法获取样本点,构造了这几种翼型参数化方法的气动Kriging代理模型,将遗传算法与Kriging代理模型结合进行翼型的优化设计,并用两个算例对这几种翼型参数化方法进行验证。

本文引用格式

廖炎平 , 刘莉 , 龙腾 . 几种翼型参数化方法研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2011 , 31(3) : 160 -164 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2011.03.031

Abstract

Some parameterized methods for airfoil were investigated in this paper, which contain linear shape function method, PARSEC method, orthogonal basis function method and Class-Shape function Transformation method. The fitting accuracy of these parameterized methods was contrasted in symmetric airfoil, cambered airfoil and supercritical airfoil. The fitting results show that the fitting accuracy of CST method is better than other parameterized methods for airfoil. The aerodynamic analysis models of these parameterized methods for airfoil were constructed. The Latin hypercube method was employed to get a set of sample points. The aerodynamic Kriging models of these parameterized methods for airfoil were built. The airfoil was optimized by combining genetic algorithm with Kriging model. These parameterized methods for airfoil were validated by two applications.

参考文献

[1]
Hicks R M, Henne P A. Wing design by numerical optimization[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(7): 407-413.
[2]
Sobieczky H. Parametric airfoils and wings[J]. Note on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 1998(68):71-88.
[3]
龙腾. 飞行器多学科设计优化方法与集成设计平台研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2009.
[4]
Robinson G M, Keane A J. Concise orthogonal representation of supercritical airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001,38(3):580-583.
[5]
Kulfan B M, Bussoletti J E. "Fundamental" parametric geometry representation for aircraft component shapes[C]// 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006. AIAA-2006-6948.
[6]
Kulfan B M. A universal parametric geometry representation method“CST"[C]// 45th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007. AIAA-2007-62.
[7]
Kulfan B M. Recent extension and application of the "CST" universal parametric geometry representation method[C]// 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Belfast, northern Ireland, 2007. AIAA-2007-7709.
[8]
Kulfan B M. Universal parametric geometry representation method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(1):142-158.
[9]
Lock R C. Test cases for numerical methods in two-dimensional transonic flows, AGARD-R-575-70 (AD715554)[R]. 1970.
文章导航

/