[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
综述、总体、动力、毁伤、测试及其他

基于FAHP-熵权-TOPSIS模型的空空导弹制导律评估

  • 马寒冰 ,
  • 贾晓洪 ,
  • 徐琰珂 ,
  • 李斌
展开
  • 中国空空导弹研究院,河南 洛阳 471009

马寒冰(2000—),女,硕士研究生。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-08-23

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-09

Research on Guidance Law Based on FAHP-Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Integrated Evaluation Method

  • MA Hanbing ,
  • JIA Xiaohong ,
  • XU Yanke ,
  • LI Bin
Expand
  • China Airborne Missile Academy,Luoyang 471009,Henan,China

Received date: 2024-08-23

  Online published: 2025-07-09

摘要

空空导弹在海背景下打击巡航导弹时,为避免鱼鳞光干扰,需要约束弹目交汇的视线方向。针对该场景,为了优选制导律,提出一种评估体系。将模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和熵权法相结合,得到结合主观和客观的评价权重,建立逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)评估模型,为优化计算结果,引入灰色关联度克服传统欧氏距离的缺陷。应用FAHP-熵权-TOPSIS模型对不同制导律在信息有偏差的情况下进行评估,通过对空空导弹脱靶量、视线角误差、攻击时间以及最大过载持续时间4项评价指标及其均值和均方差进行评估分析,应用蒙特卡洛方法对比分析联合偏置比例制导律、滑模制导律以及RBF神经网络滑模制导律三种制导律的性能。仿真实验证明,FAHP-熵权-TOPSIS综合评价方法可应用于制导律性能的评估。

本文引用格式

马寒冰 , 贾晓洪 , 徐琰珂 , 李斌 . 基于FAHP-熵权-TOPSIS模型的空空导弹制导律评估[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(3) : 359 -365 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.03.013

Abstract

When an air-to-air missile strikes a cruise missile against a sea background, it is necessary to constrain the direction of the line of sight where the missile and the target meet in order to avoid the interference of fish scale light. For this scenario, an evaluation system is proposed in order to prefer the guidance law. The fuzzy analysis hierarchy method (FAHP) and entropy weight method are combined to obtain the evaluation weights combining subjective and objective, the evaluation model of technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is established, and the grey correlation is introduced to overcome the defects of the traditional Euclidean distance in order to optimize the calculation results. The FAHP-entropy weight-TOPSIS model is applied to evaluate different guidance laws in the case of information bias, and the four evaluation indexes of air-to-air missile miss distance, line-of-sight error, attack time and maximum overload duration, as well as the mean and mean squared deviation of the four indexes are evaluated and analysed, and the Monte Carlo simulation is applied to compare the three types of guidance laws of the joint bias-proportional guidance law, the sliding-mode guidance law, and RBF neural network sliding mode guidance law to compare the performance of the three guidance laws. The simulation experiment proves that the comprehensive evaluation method of FAHP-entropy weight-TOPSIS can be applied to the evaluation and preference of the performance of the guidance law.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
马金龙, 马立元, 方丹. 自寻的反坦克导弹制导控制系统性能指标体系分析[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2019, 39(5): 115-119.

MA J L, MA L Y, FANG D. Analysis of performance index system of missile guidance control system based on simulation environment[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2019, 39(5): 115-119.

[2]
张涛. 导弹弹道设计与打击规划技术研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2023.

ZHANG T. Missile ballistic design and strike planning technology research[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2023.

[3]
李迎博, 谭黎立, 梁卓, 等. 一种基于灰色理论的制导系统评估方法研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2023, 40(9): 13-17.

LI Y B, TAN L L, LIANG Z, et al. Research on evaluation method of guidance system based on grey theory[J]. Computer Simulation, 2023, 40(9): 13-17.

[4]
佟廷帅. 基于RBF神经网络的滑模制导律研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2020.

TONG T S. Sliding mode guidance law based on RBF neural network with attack angle constraint[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2020.

[5]
王善敏, 姜长生. 空空导弹三维智能滑模导引律设计[J]. 航空兵器, 2009(6): 8-12.

WANG S M, JIANG C S. Design of a 3-D intelligent sliding mode guidance law for air-to-air missile[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2009(6): 8-12.

[6]
葛云鹏, 杨军, 袁博, 等. 基于层次评估理论的弹道导弹末段突防制导律研究[J]. 导航定位与授时, 2016, 3(4): 42-46.

GE Y P, YANG J, YUAN B, et al. Research of ballistic missile penetration guidance law at the end of the trajectory by using multiple stage analyzing theory[J]. Navigation Positioning & Timing, 2016, 3(4): 42-46.

[7]
尚帅锋. 飞行控制系统性能评估研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2014.

SHANG S F. The Research of assessing the performance of flight control system[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2014.

[8]
CHENG C H. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 343-350.

[9]
赵满运, 张雷. 复合FAHP的导弹旅核生化整体防护能力评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(11): 170-174.

ZHAO M Y, ZHANG L. Evaluation method research on the overall protection capability of NBC of missile brigade[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(11): 170-174.

[10]
CUNHA-ZERI G, GUIDOLINI J F, BRANCO E A, et al. How sustainable is the nitrogen management in Brazil? A sustainability assessment using the entropy weight method[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 316: 115330.

[11]
冯军星, 马亚龙, 王论丛. 基于熵权理想点的反坦克导弹作战效能评估[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2014, 35(11): 67-70.

FENG J X, MA Y L, WANG L C. Operational effectiveness evaluating of anti-tank missile weapon system based on entropy and ideal point methods[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2014, 35(11): 67-70.

[12]
王光源, 李浩民, 祝大程, 等. 基于熵权法-灰色关联法的海面目标威胁度评估[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2023, 45(4): 57-61.

DOI

WANG G Y, LI H M, ZHU D C, et al. Threat evaluation of targets at sea based on entropy weight-grey correlation method[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2023, 45(4): 57-61.

[13]
白玉, 徐学文, 雷瑶. 基于改进AHP-EWM的导弹装备保障能力模糊综合评估[J]. 海军航空大学学报, 2023, 38(1): 151-157.

BAI Y, XU X W, LEI Y. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of missile equipment support capability based on improved AHP-EWM[J]. Journal of Naval Aviation University, 2023, 38(1): 151-157.

[14]
李明, 罗国华, 姜春兰, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的网络化弹药攻击决策算法[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2017, 37(12): 1315-1320.

LI M, LUO G H, JIANG C L, et al. Algorithm of networked ammunition attack decision-Making based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(12): 1315-1320.

[15]
BARUKAB O, ABDULLAH S, ASHRAF S, et al. A new approach to fuzzy TOPSIS method based on entropy measure under spherical fuzzy information[J]. Entropy, 2019, 21(12): 1231.

[16]
周伟, 罗建军, 强洪夫, 等. 变权TOPSIS评估的导弹总体参数粒子群优化设计方法[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2018, 41(3): 388-394.

ZHOU W, LUO J J, QIANG H F, et al. Variable weight TOPSIS evaluation combined with particle swarm method for missile overall parameters optimization design[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2018, 41(3): 388-394.

[17]
李海君, 徐廷学, 应新永. 基于测试数据与扩展TOPSIS-灰色关联的导弹状态评估决策[J]. 航空兵器, 2021, 28(6): 88-94.

LI H J, XU Y X, YING X Y. Missile condition assessment decision based on test data and extended TOPSIS-Grey correlation[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2021, 28(6): 88-94.

[18]
杨明映, 朱昱, 杨雪松, 等. 基于灰色-层次分析的无依托机动发射作战能力评估[J]. 兵工自动化, 2020, 39(7): 56-62.

YANG M Y, ZHU Y, YANG X S, et al. Evaluation of offhand mobile operational capability based on grey hierarchy analysis method[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2020, 39(7): 56-62.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]