[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
刘家铭(1994—),男,工程师,博士,liujiaming@njust.edu.cn |
收稿日期: 2025-01-20
网络出版日期: 2025-11-28
Research on the Master Curve of Elongation for Thermally Aged Modified Double-Base Propellant
Received date: 2025-01-20
Online published: 2025-11-28
为建立考虑老化效应的改性双基(CMDB)推进剂延伸率主曲线,开展了不同测试温度(233.15K、253.15K、273.15K、283.15K、298.15K、323.15K)和应变率(3.3×10-4s-1、3.3×10-3s-1和3.3×10-2s-1)下不同高温加速老化时间后改性双基推进剂单轴拉伸试验,根据实验结果获得了最大延伸率,结合扫描电子显微镜实验分析了老化对最大延伸率的影响,基于现有理论建立了考虑老化效应的延伸率主曲线模型。研究结果表明:随着老化时间的延长,改性双基推进剂最大延伸率单调递减,拉伸断面内细观损伤逐渐加重,老化时间对材料的温度特性和率相关特性影响较小,考虑老化效应的延伸率主曲线模型可以较好地描述不同老化时间下延伸率主曲线。研究结果可为不同老化时间下固体火箭发动机药柱结构完整性分析奠定基础。
刘家铭 , 邓恒 , 杨春庆 , 朱文革 , 杨保雨 . 热老化改性双基推进剂延伸率主曲线研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 761 -768 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.020
In order to establish the elongation criterion of composite modified double-base (CMDB) propellant considering aging effect,uniaxial tensile tests of CMDB propellant were carried out under different test temperatures (233.15K,253.15K,273.15K,283.15K,293.15K,323.15K) and strain rates (3.3×10-4s-1,3.3×10-3s-1,3.3×10-2s-1).According to the experimental results,the maximum elongation was obtained,and the mechanism of the effect of aging on the maximum elongation was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM).Based on the existing theory,the master curve model of elongation considering aging effect was established.The results show that with the increase of aging time,the maximum elongation of CMDB propellant decreases monotonously,the meso-damage in the tensile section was gradually aggravated,and the aging time has little effect on the temperature and rate-dependent properties of the material.the master curve model of elongation considering aging effect can well describe the master curve of elongation under different aging time.The research results can lay a foundation for the structural integrity analysis of solid rocket motor grain under different aging time.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
程吉明. 预应变作用下复合固体推进剂损伤本构及应用研究[D]. 西北工业大学, 2019.
|
| [4] |
张兴高. HTPB推进剂贮存老化特性及寿命预估研究[D]. 国防科学技术大学, 2009.
|
| [5] |
张兴高, 张炜, 王春华, 等. 定应变作用下NEPE推进剂老化特性及寿命预估研究[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2009, 31(3):5.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
张晓军, 常新龙, 赖建伟, 等. HTPB推进剂低温拉伸/压缩力学性能对比[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2013, 36(6):4.
|
| [9] |
王鸿丽. 改性双基推进剂含损伤粘弹塑性本构模型及应用研究[D]. 南京理工大学, 2019.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
张建彬, 鞠玉涛, 周长省. 双基固体推进剂的特性研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2013(1):4.
|
| [14] |
刘家铭, 许进升, 陈雄, 等. 热老化改性双基推进剂拉伸力学性能及强度主曲线[J]. 含能材料, 2021, 29(9):9.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
刘畅, 强洪夫, 王哲君, 等. 低温动态加载下老化HTPB推进剂强度准则研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(11):7.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
GJB 770B-2005[S],火药试验方法:200-204,262-266.
GJB 770B-2005[S],Test method of propellant:200-204,262-266.
|
| [20] |
孙朝翔. 宽泛应变率和温度下改性双基推进剂本构模型及应用研究[D]. 南京理工大学, 2018.
|
| [21] |
刘子如, 张腊莹, 衡淑云, 等. 双基推进剂的玻璃化温度[J]. 火炸药学报, 2009, 32(2):4.
|
| [22] |
贾展宁. 改性双基推进剂力学性能特点分析[J]. 兵工学报, 1989.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
王哲君, 强洪夫, 广王, 等. 低温高应变率条件下HTPB推进剂拉伸力学性能研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(9):7.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
唐国金, 周建平. 自由装填药柱的结构完整性分析[J]. 固体火箭技术, 1994(2):13-20.
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
李科, 郑坚, 支建庄, 等. 丁羟包覆层老化宏微观特性相关性及贮存寿命预估[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(05):1327-1334.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |