[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
李莎莎(1988—),女,副教授,E-mail:lsslntu@163.com |
收稿日期: 2025-02-07
网络出版日期: 2025-11-28
基金资助
辽宁省教育厅高校基本科研项目(LJ212410144051)
国家自然科学基金重点项目(52434007)
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52004120)
Analysis and Characterization of Combat Effectiveness of Enemy Reconnaissance UAV in the Game between Enemy and Us
Received date: 2025-02-07
Online published: 2025-11-28
侦察无人机作战效能取决于敌我双方的共同控制。为研究影响其作战效能的因素、作战失败过程及因素变化对作战失败的影响趋势,提出了作战效能分析与复合因素空间表征方法。首先研究了作战效能及其影响因素;随后从概念描述、拓扑抽象和数学计算三方面对无人机作战失败演化过程进行研究;提出了作战效能博弈分析方法并构建了复合因素空间。研究表明:作战失败演化过程可表征作战效能变化。概念描述可采用系统故障演化模型,构建无人机作战失败演化过程。拓扑抽象使用空间故障网络模型,得到作战失败过程网络拓扑图。数学计算通过特征函数建立了数学模型,可计算各事件发生概率分布。实例展示了分析流程,得到了作战失败过程中所有事件的发生概率分布。该方法从概念、拓扑、数学层面剖析无人机作战失败过程,构建复合因素空间表征敌我作战失败情况。最后说明了研究方法的一般性质,及存在的不足和解决方法。
李莎莎 , 崔铁军 . 敌我博弈下敌方侦察无人机作战效能分析与表征[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 777 -787 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.022
The combat effectiveness of reconnaissance UAV depends on the joint control of both enemy and us. In order to study the factors that affect its combat effectiveness, the combat failure process and the influence trend of the factors change on the combat failure, the methods of combat effectiveness analysis and composite factor space characterization are proposed. Firstly, the combat effectiveness and its influencing factors are studied. Then, the evolution process of UAV combat failure is studied from concept description, topological abstraction and mathematical calculation. The game analysis method of combat effectiveness is put forward and the composite factor space is constructed. The research shows that the evolution process of combat failure can represent the change of combat effectiveness. The system failure evolution model can be used to construct the evolution process of UAV combat failure. The topology abstraction uses the space fault network model to obtain the network topology of the combat failure process. The mathematical model is established by the characteristic function, and the probability distribution of each event can be calculated. The example shows the process of analysis and obtains the probability distribution of all events in the combat failure process. This method analyzes the combat failure process of UAVs from the aspects of concept, topology, and mathematics, and constructs a composite factor space to represent the combat failure situations of both sides. Finally, the general properties of the research method are explained, as well as its existing shortcomings and solutions.
| [1] |
杨彦杰, 史公莱. 无人机光电制导装置的模拟对抗分析[J]. 电子技术, 2024, 53(09):16-17.
|
| [2] |
董彦非, 王一航. 基于效费分析的无人侦察机效能分配方法研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2024, 49(09):83-89.
|
| [3] |
孙鹏耀, 黄炎焱, 王凯生, 等. 不确定态势下基于作战过程仿真的无人机群协同作战效能评估[J/OL]. 指挥控制与仿真, 1-14[2024-11-21].
|
| [4] |
韩月明, 李元. 基于改进层次分析法的无人机集群作战效能评估[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2024, 44(07):123-127+137.
|
| [5] |
单正驰. 基于AHP和模糊层次分析法的无人机作战效能评估[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2024, 44(06):128-132.
|
| [6] |
马丹, 孙亘, 王兴虎, 等. 面向不完备态势的复杂系统效能评估方法研究[J]. 无人系统技术, 2024, 7(03):75-82.
|
| [7] |
陈明秀, 刘加凯. 无人机载武器精确打击系统作战效能评估[J]. 装备制造技术, 2024,(06):33-39.
|
| [8] |
费陈, 张帆, 赵亮, 等. 有人-无人机协同技术研究[J/OL]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 1-11[2024-11-21].
|
| [9] |
张效天, 彭文成, 刘瑞. 某无人机系统作战效能评估研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2024, 49(05):152-157.
|
| [10] |
曹志敏, 周玉芳. 智能化作战效能评估指标体系构建方法[J/OL]. 指挥控制与仿真, 1-7[2024-11-21].
|
| [11] |
刘登攀, 寇昆湖, 王超, 等. 基于改进ADC法的侦察无人机作战效能评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2024, 31(04):121-127.
|
| [12] |
黄若超, 高宏超, 毛瑞, 等. 直升机载航空火箭弹仰射作战分析[J/OL]. 弹箭与制导学报, 1-7[2025-02-13].
|
| [13] |
李鹏, 张华涛, 闫代维, 等. 无人机载导弹武器系统作战效能评估研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2022, 42 (03):116-120.
|
| [14] |
崔铁军, 李莎莎. 系统故障演化过程最终事件状态及发生概率研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(08):1-7.
|
| [15] |
崔铁军. 空间故障网络理论与系统故障演化过程研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(04):1255-1262.
|
| [16] |
胡阳光, 肖明清, 孔庆春, 等. 侦察型空射诱饵弹作战效能评估模型及方法[J]. 计算机仿真, 2016, 33(08):44-48+152.
|
| [17] |
崔铁军, 李莎莎. 量子态叠加的事件发生柔性逻辑统一表达式研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2024, 42(04):774-782.
|
| [18] |
崔铁军, 李莎莎. 空间故障网络的柔性逻辑描述[J]. 智能系统学报, 2021, 16(03):552-559.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |