[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
熊宗健(2001—),男,硕士研究生。E-mail:3034544345@qq.com |
收稿日期: 2025-03-04
网络出版日期: 2025-11-28
Impact of Multi-Nozzle Configuration on the Base Thermal Environment of Rockets
Received date: 2025-03-04
Online published: 2025-11-28
火箭作为深空探测的核心运载工具,在其上升过程中,发动机喷出的高温燃气与周围空气相互作用,在火箭底部形成高温燃气流场,这种极端的热环境会导致运载火箭底部电子设备失效,严重威胁火箭飞行安全。针对“8+1”构型多喷管运载火箭不同喷管布局底部热环境问题,采用计算流体力学数值模拟的方法,基于有限体积法,使用DO辐射模型考虑H2O、CO2、CO等强辐射气体的辐射作用,采用Realizable k-☐湍流模型、多组分模型研究不同飞行高度下“8+1”喷管布局相对位置对运载火箭底部热环境的影响。研究结果表明喷管布局对运载火箭底部热环境影响较大。中心喷管后移在低空环境能改善底部热环境,在高空时会恶化底部热环境;外围喷管向内移动、向外移动和向外偏转在不同高度下均能改善火箭底部热流环境至多改善69.3%。
熊宗健 , 赵雨辰 , 姜毅 , 闫沛泽 , 刘汉宇 . 多喷管布局对火箭底部热环境影响研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 817 -826 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.026
As the principal launch platform for deep space exploration, rockets generate high-temperature combustion gas flow fields at their base during ascent due to interactions between engine-exhaust plumes and ambient air. This extreme thermal environment can cause electronic equipment failure and seriously threaten flight safety. To investigate the base thermal environment of an "8+1" clustered-nozzle launch vehicle with different nozzle arrangements, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulations were conducted using the finite volume method. The study employed the Discrete Ordinates (DO) radiation model considering radiative effects from strong emitters (H2O, CO2, CO), along with the Realizable k-ε turbulence model and multi-component model to analyze how relative nozzle positions affect base thermal environments at different altitudes. Results demonstrate significant nozzle arrangement impacts: Rearward displacement of the central nozzle improves base thermal conditions at low altitudes but worsens them at high altitudes. Inward/outward shifting or outward deflection of peripheral nozzles consistently reduces base heat flux across altitudes, achieving maximum improvements of up to 69.3%.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
闫指江, 吴彦森, 张耘隆, 等. 国内外运载火箭一级底部喷流热环境研究综述[J]. 载人航天, 2021, 27 (02): 262-268.
|
| [3] |
孙培杰, 王东保, 杨帆, 等. 运载高空发动机喷流热环境分析及飞行验证[J]. 上海航天, 2016, 33 (S1): 23-28.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
王迅. 发动机喷流干扰对底部热环境影响研究[J]. 宇航总体技术, 2021, 5 (02): 24-30.
|
| [10] |
周志坛, 丁逸夫, 乐贵高, 等. 高空飞行环境中液体运载火箭底部热环境研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2019, 40(5): 577.
|
| [11] |
周志坛, 李怡庆, 江平, 等. 二次燃烧对多喷管运载火箭底部热环境影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024(06): 292-303.
|
| [12] |
杨岩, 田原, 丁兆波, 等. 多机并联火箭羽流流场及其底部热环境分析[J]. 宇航学报, 2021, 42(11): 1446.
|
| [13] |
闫指江, 沈丹, 吴彦森, 等. 多喷管运载火箭底部热环境研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2021(01): 105-109+114.
|
| [14] |
史亚男. 喷管羽流对捆绑式运载火箭底部热环境的影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2016.
|
| [15] |
赵一霖, 严立, 来霄毅, 等. 新一代四机并联火箭发动机喷流热环境数值研究[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6 (01): 109-116.
|
| [16] |
赵晨耕, 孙中一, 苏逸飞, 等. 高空飞行多级运载火箭基础热环境控制研究[J]. 航空动力学报: 2024, 39(12): 384-394.
|
| [17] |
孙中一, 王舒雅, 尉志源, 等. 搭载辅助动力系统的二级火箭底部热环境分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(07), 48-57.
|
| [18] |
戴欣怡. 固体捆绑火箭内部过程及底部对流热环境研究[D]. 上海交通大学, 2015.
|
| [19] |
蒲鹏宇. 双喷管液氧煤油运载火箭底部热环境研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2021.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |