[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
任凯(1997-),男,工程师,E-mail: renkself@163.com |
收稿日期: 2025-04-07
网络出版日期: 2025-11-28
Airfoil Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Surrogate Model and Deep Reinforcement Learning
Received date: 2025-04-07
Online published: 2025-11-28
为了提高基于深度强化学习的气动外形优化效率,提出基于代理模型的深度强化学习气动优化框架。深度强化学习存在样本利用率低的问题,在气动优化中需要大量使用流场数值模拟来获取样本数据,通过引入代理模型,能够快速生成样本数据,减小对流场数值模拟的依赖,提高气动优化效率。在跨声速翼型减阻优化设计中,仅使用深度强化学习和使用基于代理模型的深度强化学习优化方法都能获得最优解,但代理模型的使用能够使流场数值仿真次数减少67%,显著提升优化效率,在翼型反设计中,基于代理模型的深度强化学习优化方法得到的反设计翼型和目标翼型压力分布以及翼型形状均吻合较好,进一步验证了提出的基于代理模型的深度强化学习气动优化框架的有效性。
任凯 , 石永彬 , 卜月鹏 , 张阳 , 童静 , 田斯源 . 基于代理模型和深度强化学习的翼型优化设计[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 878 -886 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.032
To enhance the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL), a DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models is proposed. Deep reinforcement learning suffers from low sample efficiency, in aerodynamic optimization, it requires extensive use of flow field numerical simulations to obtain sample data. However, high-precision flow field numerical simulations come with a substantial computational cost in terms of time. By introducing surrogate models, it can rapidly generate sample data, reduce the dependence on high-precision flow field numerical simulations, and improve the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization. Taking the transonic airfoil drag reduction optimization design and inverse design as examples, the effectiveness of the DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models is analyzed. In transonic airfoil drag reduction optimization design, both DRL and DRL based on surrogate models achieve optimal solutions, eliminate the shock waves. However, the use of surrogate models reduces the number of high-precision flow field numerical simulations by 67%, significantly improving optimization efficiency. In airfoil inverse design, the pressure distribution and shape of the inversely designed airfoil obtained through DRL based on surrogate models show good agreement with the target airfoil. Both examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models.
| [1] |
林杰, 唐志共, 钱炜祺, 等. 飞行器生成式气动设计研究进展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(10): 631679.
|
| [2] |
韩忠华, 高正红, 宋文萍, 等. 翼型研究的历史、现状与未来发展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(6): 1-36.
|
| [3] |
夏陈超. 基于CFD的飞行器高保真度气动外形优化设计方法[D]. 浙江: 浙江大学, 2016.
|
| [4] |
韩忠华, 许晨舟, 乔建领, 等. 基于代理模型的高效全局气动优化设计方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(05): 30-70.
|
| [5] |
唐志共, 朱林阳, 向星皓, 等. 智能空气动力学若干研究进展及展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(7): 1-35.
|
| [6] |
张伟伟, 寇家庆, 刘溢浪. 智能赋能流体力学展望[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(04):26-71.
|
| [7] |
吴智, 范德威, 周裕. 人工智能控制湍流进展: 系统、算法、成就、数据分析方法[J]. 力学进展, 2023, 53(2): 273-307.
|
| [8] |
张天姣, 钱炜祺, 周宇, 等. 人工智能与空气动力学结合的初步思考[J]. 航空工程进展, 2019, 10(1): 1-11.
|
| [9] |
陈海昕, 邓凯文, 李润泽. 机器学习技术在气动优化中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(01):52-68.
|
| [10] |
孙刚, 王聪, 王立悦, 等. 人工智能在气动设计中的应用与展望[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2021(03): 1-9+147.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
李润泽, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. 针对超临界翼型气动修型策略的强化学习[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(04):275-288.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
张峻伟, 吕帅, 张正昊, 等. 基于样本效率优化的深度强化学习方法综述[J]. 软件学报, 2022, 33(11): 4217-4238.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |