[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

弹箭与制导学报 >

2025 , Vol. 45 >Issue 5: 900 - 910

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.034

学术文章

罩顶形状对小口径聚能装药侵彻性能影响

  • 王萧鉴 , 1 ,
  • 李文军 2 ,
  • 梁增友 , 1, * ,
  • 李巧歌 1 ,
  • 高冉 1 ,
  • 罗佳睿 1
展开
  • 1 中北大学机电工程学院, 山西 太原 030051
  • 2 青岛凯瑞电子有限公司, 山东 青岛 266109
梁增友(1969—),男,教授,博士,

王萧鉴(2002—),男,硕士研究生,

收稿日期: 2025-04-17

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-28

收起

Influence of Liner Top Shape on Penetration Performance of Small-Caliber Shaped Charges

  • WANG Xiaojian , 1 ,
  • LI Wenjun 2 ,
  • LIANG Zengyou , 1, * ,
  • LI Qiaoge 1 ,
  • GAO Ran 1 ,
  • LUO Jiarui 1
Expand
  • 1 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China
  • 2 Qingdao Kairui Electronics Company Limited, Qingdao 266109,Shandong, China

Received date: 2025-04-17

  Online published: 2025-11-28

Fold

摘要

针对无人机轻量化发展战斗部携带能力受限的问题,设计了直径为20 mm的小口径聚能装药,通过数值模拟方法对比并分析了平顶型、锥顶型与圆顶型三种罩顶形状对射流成型状态的影响,开展了三种罩顶形状不同炸高下侵彻45#钢靶的仿真,并通过试验对仿真侵彻结果进行验证。结果表明,平顶型结构所形成的射流相对于其他两种结构头部与杵体更粗,射流总长度更短;当炸高为3倍口径时,三种射流的侵彻深度与开孔直径均最佳,其中平顶结构射流侵彻深度与开孔直径分别为70.5 mm与7.81 mm,高于其他两种。仿真结果与试验结果在侵彻深度与开孔直径上的误差分别为2.17%和3.88%,证明数值模拟有限元模型可靠。该研究可为不同罩顶形状射流成型与小口径聚能装药侵彻性能研究提供参考。

关键词： 聚能装药; 罩顶形状; 数值模拟; 射流侵彻; 射流成型

本文引用格式

王萧鉴 , 李文军 , 梁增友 , 李巧歌 , 高冉 , 罗佳睿 . 罩顶形状对小口径聚能装药侵彻性能影响[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 900 -910 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.034

Abstract

To mitigate warhead payload constraints imposed by unmanned aerial vehicles’ lightweight requirements, this study develops a 20mm small-diameter shaped charge configuration. Numerical simulations are utilized to conduct research on how three liner head geometries (flat-top, conical-top, and dome-top) affect the formation state of shaped charges, and how the penetration of 45# steel targets by these geometries at different standoff distances affects the damage characteristics. In addition, relevant penetration experiments are conducted to validate the simulation results. The results demonstrate that, compared with the other two configurations, the jet formed by the flat-top structure has a thicker head and slug, and a shorter total jet length. When the standoff distance is 3 times the caliber, the penetration depth and perforation diameter of the three jets are optimal. Among them, the jet of the flat-top structure has a penetration depth of 70.5 mm and a perforation diameter of 7.81 mm, which are higher than those of the other two structures. The discrepancies between the simulation results and the experimental data in terms of penetration depth and perforation diameter are 2.17% and 3.88%, respectively, demonstrating the reliability of the numerical simulation finite element model. This study can provide references for the research on jet formation with different liner head shapes and the penetration performance of small-caliber-shaped charges.

Key words： shaped charge; liner top shape; numerical simulation; jet penetration; jet formation

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
赵富裕, 王成, 王泽宇, 等. 双锥药型罩聚能射流侵彻钢靶板试验与高精度仿真[J]. 振动与冲击, 2025, 44(03): 150-162+181.

ZHAO F Y, WANG C, WANG Z Y, et al. Experiment and high-precision simulation of shaped charge jet penetration into steel target with double-cone liner[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2025, 44(03): 150-162+181.

[2]
张雪梅, 谢兴博, 钟明寿, 等. 不同聚能装药水中冲击引爆靶后B炸药特性研究[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 1-14,2025-03-31.

ZHANG X M, XIE X B, ZHONG M S, et al. Characteristics of underwater shock initiation of composition B behind target by different shaped charges[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 1-14,2025-03-31.

[3]
崔平, 许艳丽, 翟安琪, 等. 锆基非晶合金含能射流大炸高形态与毁伤性能试验研究[J/OL]. 火工品, 1-7,2025-03-31.

CUI P, XU Y L, ZHAI A Q, et al. Experimental study on morphology and damage performance of Zr-based amorphous alloy energetic jet at large standoff distance[J/OL]. Initiators & Pyrotechnics, 1-7,2025-03-31.

[4]
田康, 朱家萱, 郭保全, 等. 聚能杆式射流结构正交优化设计及其侵彻能力数值模拟研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2024, 44(06): 13-18+27.

TIAN K, ZHU J X, GUO B Q, et al. Orthogonal optimization design of shaped charge rod jet structure and numerical simulation of its penetration capability[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2024, 44(06): 13-18+27.

[5]
刘承哲, 王海福, 张甲浩, 等. 轻质高熵合金聚能射流毁伤混凝土靶行为研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(S1): 60-69.

DOI

LIU C Z, WANG H F, ZHANG J H, et al. Damage behavior of lightweight high-entropy alloy shaped charge jet against concrete target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S1): 60-69.

[6]
方一舟, 张先锋, 熊玮, 等. 聚能射流侵彻有限厚钢靶后效参数的特性[J]. 含能材料, 2024, 32(9): 899-910.

FANG Y Z, ZHANG X F, XIONG W, et al. Characteristics of after-effect parameters for shaped charge jet penetrating finite-thickness steel target[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2024, 32(9): 899-910.

[7]
王靖雯, 袁浩, 任凯, 等. 药型罩几何参数对新型聚能战斗部侵彻能力影响规律研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2024, 44(03):22-28.

WANG J W, YUAN H, REN K, et al. Influence law of liner geometric parameters on penetration capability of new shaped charge warhead[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2024, 44(03): 22-28.

[8]
Guo Y C, Peng S P, Yang R S. Experimental and numerical simulation study on penetration damage effect of parabolic-shaped charge[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 91.

DOI

[9]
Wang M, Qiu J W, Chen X W, et al. Study on the Damage Effect of Shaped Charge Jet Penetrating Multi-layer Spaced Inclined Target Plates[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2891(5): 052016.

DOI

[10]
Voitenko Y, Sydorenko D, et al. Influence of Liner Form and Explosive on the Velocity and Mechanical Action of a Shaped-Charge Jet[J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2024, 21(3): 320-337.

DOI

[11]
张朝平, 张先锋, 谈梦婷, 等. 聚能杆式射流侵彻混凝土和岩石靶体试验与数值模拟[J]. 含能材料, 2023, 31(08): 773-785.

ZHANG C P, ZHANG X F, TAN M T, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of shaped charge rod jet penetrating concrete and rock targets[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2023, 31(08): 773-785.

[12]
付恒, 陈智刚, 杨大昭, 等. 杆式射流侵彻钢筋混凝土试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(S2): 133-137.

FU H, CHEN Z G, YANG D Z, et al. Experimental study on rod jet penetrating reinforced concrete[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(S2): 133-137.

[13]
刘丹丹, 姜志敏. 军事无人机作战应用及发展趋势[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2020, 43(6): 30-33+38.

LIU D D, JIANG Z M. Combat application and development trend of military UAV[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2020, 43(6): 30-33+38.

[14]
赵振森, 王克印, 李永健, 等. 小型无人机武器化及其发展前景分析[J]. 飞航导弹, 2018(6): 22-25.

ZHAO Z S, WANG K Y, LI Y J, et al. Weaponization of small UAV and its development prospect analysis[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2018(6): 22-25.

[15]
Kou P F, Cao L, Liang Z F, et al. Research Status and Development Trend of Tandem Armor-Breaking Warheads[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2478(7): 072025.

DOI

[16]
米海明, 余庆波, 何鲁哲, 等. 小口径聚能装药对反应装甲引爆效应数值模拟[J]. 北京理工大学学报自然版, 2017, 37(s2): 119-124.

MI H M, YU Q B, HE L Z, et al. Numerical simulation of initiation effect of small caliber shaped charge on reactive armor[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(s2): 119-124.

[17]
黄正祥编著. 聚能装药理论与实践[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2014.

HUANG Z X. Theory and practice of shaped charge[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014.

[18]
刘波, 姚志敏. 聚能破甲战斗部药型罩不同形状锥顶对射流影响的数值模拟[J]. 机械设计与研究. 2014,(4):78-81.

LIU B, YAO Z M. Numerical simulation of influence of different cone apex shapes on jet formation for shaped charge liner[J]. Machine Design and Research, 2014(4): 78-81.

[19]
王晓东, 徐永杰, 郑娜娜, 等. 药型罩结构对线型聚能装药侵彻性能影响的仿真研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45(03):128-134.

WANG X D, XU Y J, ZHENG N N, et al. Simulation study on the influence of liner structure on the penetration performance of linear shaped charge[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2024, 45(3): 128-134.

[20]
HAN ZY, JI C, WANG X, et al. Study on optimization of jet forming of tandem shaped charge warhead.[J]. Vibroengineering Procedia, 2022, Vol.44: 130-135

[21]
唐长刚编著. LS-DYNA有限元分析及仿真[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014.

TANG C G. LS-DYNA finite element analysis and simulation[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2014.

[22]
袁志丹, 张永召, 王强,黎勇编. LS-DYNA有限元分析常见问题及案例详解[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2021.

YUAN Z D, ZHANG Y Z, WANG Q, et al. Common problems and case studies of LS-DYNA finite element analysis[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2021.

[23]
辛春亮, 薛再清, 涂建, 赵利军, 刘安阳. TrueGrid和LS-DYNA动力学数值计算详解[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2019

XIN C L, XUE Z Q, TU J, et al. Detailed explanation of dynamic numerical calculation with TrueGrid and LS-DYNA[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2019.

[24]
王钰婷, 黄正祥, 贾鑫, 等. 椭圆形截面聚能装药射流成型及侵彻特性[J]. 含能材料. 2021,(2):96-106.

WANG Y T, HUANG Z X, JIA X, et al. Jet formation and penetration characteristics of elliptical cross-section shaped charge[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021(2): 96-106.

[25]
HU F, ZHANG Y, YAO M L, et al. Simulation Study of the Damage Effect of Tandem Warhead on Concrete Target[J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2024, Vol. 10(1): 04023051.

[26]
辛春亮, 朱星宇, 薛再清, 涂建,闪雨编著. 有限元分析常用材料参数手册第2版[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2022.

XIN C L, ZHU X Y, XUE Z Q, et al. Handbook of common material parameters for finite element analysis (2nd Edition)[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2022.

[27]
王树山著. 终点效应学第2版[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.

WANG S S. Terminal effects (2nd Edition)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.

[28]
张政贤. 某小口径破甲战斗部威力的影响规律研究[D]. t太原: 中北大学, 2024.

ZHANG Z X. Research on the influence law of the power of a small caliber shaped charge warhead[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2024.

[29]
尹建平, 王志军. 弹药学第4版[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2023.

YIN J P, WANG Z J. Ammunition science (4th Edition)[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2023.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]