[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

弹箭与制导学报 >

2025 , Vol. 45 >Issue 2: 241 - 250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.02.015

跨声速激波振荡与空腔流动耦合机理及控制方法研究

  • 尹李筱 ,
  • 赵小见
展开
  • 北京理工大学宇航学院, 北京 100081
赵小见(1982—), 男, 博士, 副教授。E-mail:

尹李筱(2002—), 男, 硕士研究生。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-15

收起

Coupling Mechanism and Control Methods of Transonic Shock Oscillation and Cavity Flow

  • YIN Lixiao ,
  • ZHAO Xiaojian
Expand
  • School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2025-02-14

  Online published: 2025-05-15

Fold

摘要

跨声速激波振荡与空腔流动均是可侧向机动火箭导弹强脉动压力及结构振动的主要诱因。然而, 现有研究多集中于讨论单一流动特征对壁面载荷环境的影响, 并未关注两种非定常流动现象的耦合作用, 为特定条件下飞行器的安全埋下一定的隐患。文中以典型火箭整流罩及侧壁空腔结构为研究对象, 采用延迟分离涡模拟(delayed detached eddy simulation, DDES)方法对跨声速激波振荡与空腔流动同时存在工况下的流场特征和脉动压力时频特性开展数值研究, 探讨激波振荡与空腔流动的耦合作用机理。研究结果表明:空腔流动减少了分离流对激波的作用从而减弱跨声速激波振荡的强度, 而激波振荡使得空腔流场趋于稳定, 显著降低了空腔壁面声压级(sound pressure level, SPL), 0.95Ma工况下最多可达30 dB。基于对跨声速耦合流场流动规律的认知, 设计了耦合流场的3种流动控制方案。对比结果发现:空腔前缘斜坡有利于促进激波振荡与空腔流动的相互抑制作用, 进而降低空腔壁面脉动压力水平。跨声速激波振荡与空腔流动耦合流场分析可为新一代飞行器研制提供一定支撑作用。

关键词： 跨声速流动; 激波振荡; 空腔流动; 脉动压力; 流动控制

本文引用格式

尹李筱 , 赵小见 . 跨声速激波振荡与空腔流动耦合机理及控制方法研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2025 , 45(2) : 241 -250 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.02.015

Abstract

Transonic shock oscillations and cavity flows are both primary contributors to the intense pulsating pressures and structural vibrations in laterally maneuverable rocket missiles. However, existing studies have predominantly focused on single flow characteristics impacting on the wall load environment, while neglecting the coupling effects between two unsteady flow phenomena. This oversight poses potential risks to the flight safety of aerospace vehicles under specific flight conditions. In this study, a rocket fairing and a sidewall cavity structure are employed as the research subjects. The Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) method is utilized to conduct a numerical investigation into the flow field characteristics and the time-frequency properties of pulsating pressures in the presence of both transonic shock oscillations and cavity flows, aiming to explore the coupling mechanisms between shock oscillations and cavity flows. The research findings indicate that cavity flows reduce the effect of separated flows on the shock, thereby weakening the intensity of transonic shock oscillations, while shock oscillations stabilize the cavity flow field, significantly lowering the sound pressure level (SPL) on the cavity walls, maximally, which can reach up to 30 dB at Mach 0.95. Based on the flow dynamics cognition in coupled transonic flow fields, 3 flow control strategies for the coupled flow field are designed. Comparative results reveal that a steep rise in leading edge of the cavity promotes the mutual inhibition of shock oscillations and cavity flows, thereby reducing the pulsating pressure levels on the cavity walls. The analysis of the coupled flow field involving transonic shock oscillations and cavity flows provides valuable support for the development of next-generation aerospace vehicles.

Key words： transonic flow; shock oscillation; cavity flow; pressure fluctuations; flow control

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
邢成龙, 乐贵高, 沈林, 等. 导流槽构型对火箭起飞时流场和声场的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(3):589-596.

XING C L, LE G G, SHEN L, et al. Influence of jet deflector configuration on flow field and acoustics field of launch vehicle at lift-off[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(3): 589-596.

[2]
HUMPHREYS M D. Pressure pulsations on rigid airfoils at transonic speeds: NACA RM L51112[R]. Washington, D. C.: NACA, 1951.

[3]
MCDEVITT J B, LEVY L L, Jr, DEIWERT G S. Transonic flow about a thick circular-arc airfoil[J]. AlAA Journal, 1976, 14(5): 606-613.

[4]
LEE B H K, OHMAN L H. Unsteady pressures and forces during transonic buffeting of a supercritical airfoil[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1984, 21(6): 439-441.

[5]
LEE B H K. Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(5): 942-944.

[6]
LEE B H K, MURTY H, JIANG H. Role of Kutta waves on oscillatory shock motion on an airfoil[J]. AlAA Journal, 1994, 32(4): 789-796.

[7]
张伟伟, 高传强, 叶正寅. 机翼跨声速抖振研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4): 1056-1075.

DOI

ZHANG W W, GAO C Q, YE Z Y. Research advances of wing/airfoil transonic buffet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1056-1075.

DOI

[8]
高传强, 张伟伟. 机翼跨声速抖振数值模拟及模态分析[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40 (7): 19-33.

GAO C Q, ZHANG W W. Numerical simulation and modal analysis of transonic buffet flow over wings[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(7): 19-33.

[9]
赵瑞, 荣吉利, 任方, 等. 火箭整流罩外气动噪声环境的大涡模拟研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2015, 36 (9): 988-994.

ZHAO R, RONG J L, REN F, et al. Large eddy simulation of the aeroacoustic environment of a rocket fairing[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2015, 36(9), 988-994.

[10]
贾居红, 胡丽杰. 锥柱裙组合体再入气动热特性研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2019, 39(3): 107-110.

JIA J H, HU L J. Aerothermodynamics research on cone-cylinder-flare configuration reentry vehicle[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2019, 39(3): 107-110.

[11]
李凰立, 苏虹, 沈丹, 等. 飞行器脉动压力的CAA方法研究[J]. 强度与环境, 2019, 46(2): 13-20.

LI H L, SU H, SHEN D, et al. Fluctuating pressure simulation of aircraft based on computational aeroacoustics[J]. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2019, 46(2): 13-20.

[12]
王英诚, 杨浩亮, 史晓宁, 等. 运载火箭主动上升段跨声速抖振问题[J]. 现代应用物理, 2023, 14(2): 208-215.

WANG C Y, YANG H L, SHI X N, et al. Transonic buffeting in the active ascending phase of a launch vehicle[J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2023, 14(2): 208-215.

[13]
张斯澄, 吕本帅, 刘振皓, 等. 跨声速流动激波边界层干扰分离流动特征研究[J]. 强度与环境, 2023, 50(1):31-37.

ZHANG S C, LYV B S, LIU Z H, et al. Characteristics of transonic flow separation due to shock-boundary layer interaction[J]. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2023, 50(1): 31-37.

[14]
童福林, 唐志共, 李新亮, 等. 压缩拐角激波与旁路转捩边界层干扰数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3588-3604.

DOI

TONG F L, TANG Z G, LI X L, et al. Numerical study of shock wave and bypass transitional boundary layer interaction in a supersonic compression ramp[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(12):3588-3604.

DOI

[15]
童福林, 段俊亦, 周桂宇, 等. 激波/湍流边界层干扰压力脉动特性数值研究[J]. 力学学报, 2021, 53(7): 1829-1841.

TONG F L, DUAN J Y, ZHOU G Y, et al. Statistical characteristics of pressure fluctuation in shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(7): 1829-1841.

[16]
ROSSITER J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds: RAE Tech report: 64037[R]. London: Royal Aircraft Establishment Tech, 1964.

[17]
STALLINGS R L, WILCOX F J. Experimental cavity pressure distributions at supersonic speeds: NASA-TP-2683[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1987.

[18]
杨党国, 范召林, 罗新福, 等. 跨超声速空腔静态流动特性数值及试验研究[C]// 四川省力学学会. 四川省力学学会2008年学术大会论文集. 成都: 四川大学学报(工程科学版)编辑部, 2008: 206-209.

YANG D G, FAN Z L, LUO X F, et al. Studies on transonic and supersonic static flow characteristics of cavity by numerical simulation and wind tunnel tests[C]// Sichuan Society in Mechanics. Paper of 2008 academic conference of Sichuan Society in Mechanics. Chengdu: Journal of Sichuan University(Engineering Science Edition) Editorial Department, 2008: 206-209.

[19]
王显圣, 周方奇, 徐来武, 等. 内埋弹舱流动/振动/噪声多场载荷实验[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(3): 160-168.

WANG X S, ZHOU F Q, XU L W, et al. Experiments on multi-field loads of fiow/vibraion/noise induced by internal weapons bay[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(3): 160-168.

[20]
王显圣, 杨党国, 刘俊, 等. 弹性空腔流致噪声/结构振动特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 182-191.

WANG X S, YANG D G, LIU J, et al. Test on interactions between aeroacoustic noise and structural vibration in elastic cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 182-191.

[21]
NILSSON S, YAO H D, KARLSSON A, et al. Effects of aeroelastic walls on the aeroacoustics in transonic cavity flow[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(11): 716.

[22]
GUO G M, PU C, GONG J J, et al. Influence of upstream wall slope on aerodynamic properties of a rectangular cavity in rarefied hypersonic flows[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023, 136: 108217.

[23]
马丽璇, 李恩义, 孙书霞, 等. 跨声速空腔声学特性数值模拟[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2020, 38(5): 10-16.

MA L X, LI E Y, SUN S X, et al. Numerical simulation of transonic cavity acoustic properties[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2020, 38(5): 10-16.

[24]
DOSHI P S, RANJAN R, GAITONDE D V. Global and local modal characteristics of supersonic open cavity flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022(3): 1-19.

[25]
LI Z X, MANH T D, GERDROODBARY M B, et al. The influence of the wedge shock generator on the vortex structure within the trapezoidal cavity at supersonic flow[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 98(C): 105695.

[26]
刘俊, 蔡晋生, 杨党国, 等. 超声速空腔流动波系演化及噪声控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11):18-36.

LIU J, CAI J S, YANG D G, et al. Research progress in wave evolution and noise control for supersonic cavity flows[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 18-36.

[27]
刘俊, 蔡晋生, 周方奇. 空腔噪声的马赫数敏感性研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(3): 104-110.

LIU J, CAI J S, ZHOU F Q. Mach number sensitivity analysis of cavity noise[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(3):104-110.

[28]
刘俊, 罗新福, 王显圣. 前缘形状对空腔模型气动特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 78-88.

LIU J, LUO X F, WANG X S. Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 78-88.

[29]
WANG X S, YANG D G, LIU J, et al. Control of pressure oscillations induced by supersonic cavity flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(5): 2070-2077.

[30]
ZHAO X J, XU K L, CHEN Y C. Spatiotemporal correlation and control of wall pressure fluctuations induced by subsonic cavity flows[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2021, 89: 312-322.

[31]
宁舜山, 张倩, 肖伟, 等. 形状变化对空腔噪声的抑制效果[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(22): 209-215.

NING S S, ZHANG Q, XIAO W, et al. Effect of the shape change of cavity on aerodynamic noise suppression[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(22): 209-215.

[32]
马瑞轩, 李征初, 宋玉宝, 等. 基于传声器阵列的低速空腔噪声控制试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41 (5): 267-272.

MA R X, LI Z C, SONG Y B, et al. Low-speed cavity noise control tests based on microphone array[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41 (5): 267-272.

[33]
HENSHAW M J. M219 cavity case: ADP012729[R]. London: Military Aircraft and Aerostructures, 2000.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]