[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >

2010 , Vol. 30 >Issue 3: 59 - 62

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2010.03.046

PROJECTILES TECHNOLOGY

The Analysis of Arch Structure Subjected to Blast Loading

  • LENG Binglin ,
  • XU Jinyu ,
  • DUAN Jixiang ,
  • XU Jie
Expand
  • 1 No. 95080 Unit, Guangdong Shantou 515800, China
    2 The 9th Engineering Corps, China Airport Construction Group Corporation, Shanghai 201105, China
    3 The Engineering Institute, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China
    4 Air Force Survery and Design Institute, Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing 210007, China
    5 No. 95538 Unit, Sichuan Xinjin 611430, China

Received date: 2009-05-16

  Online published: 2025-05-28

Fold

Abstract

For comparing the anti-explosion performance of three different material arc structures, the corresponding numerical simulation was conducted by using element program LS-DYNA3D. The arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) algorithm was used to simulate the dynamical matter, such as the forming process and development disciplinarian of explosive cavity. According to simulation, the propagation of the stress wave and the influences of soil layer were studied, the size of blast pit, the damage form, stress contour, pressure time curve and energy time in three different material arc structures were comparatively analyzed. The research shows that the RPC arc structure element can endure more principal stress, so it holds the stronger capability to absorb the energy from explosion, thus the RPC arc structures possess the predominant capability of the prevent collapse and integrality of the structure.

Key words： blast loading; concrete; numerical simulation; finite element method; explosive capitation

Cite this article

LENG Binglin , XU Jinyu , DUAN Jixiang , XU Jie . The Analysis of Arch Structure Subjected to Blast Loading[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010 , 30(3) : 59 -62 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2010.03.046

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

[1]
Hao H, Cheong H K, Cui S J. Numerical study of dynamic buckling of steel columns subjected to underground explosion[J]. Journal of Key Engineering Materials, 2002, 233-236: 211-216.
[2]
Cui S J, Cheong H K, Hao H. Elastic plastic dynamic response and buckling of steel columns under ground strong vertical ground motion[J]. Journal of Key Engineering Materials, 2002, 233-236: 217-222.
[3]
Fatt M S H, Ouyang X, Dinan R J. Blast response of walls retrofitted with elastomer coatings[G]// Structures under Shock & Impact VIII, 2004, 15: 129-138.
[4]
Pandey A K, Ram K, Paul D K, et al. Non-linear response of reinforced concrete containment structure under blast loading[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2006, 236(9): 993-1002.
[5]
尚小江, 苏建宇. ANSYS/LS-DYNA 动力分析方法与工程实例[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005.
[6]
董香永, 夏昌平, 段祝平. 平面爆炸波在半无限混凝土介质中传播与衰减特性的数值分析[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(2): 60-65.
[7]
蔡洪亮. 动能弹对混凝土靶侵彻规律研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2006.
[8]
白金泽. LS-DYNA3D 理论基础与实例分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
[9]
王成, 付晓磊, 宁建国. 柱形装药爆炸破坏混凝土的数值模拟分析[J]. 计算力学学报, 2007, 24(3): 318-322.
[10]
戴俊. 柱状装药爆破的岩石压碎圈与裂隙圈计算[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 20(4): 144-147.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]