[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >

2020 , Vol. 40 >Issue 3: 39 - 44

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2020.03.010

Comparison and Error Modeling of Several Attitude Algorithms Under Coning Motion

  • XIONG Lijuan 1, 2 ,
  • ZHU Hongtao 1 ,
  • WANG Zhiyong 1 ,
  • CAO Juanhua 1 ,
  • ZHOU Bo 3
Expand
  • 1 School of Mechatronics Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
  • 2 School of Aeronautical Manufacturing Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
  • 3 School of Measurement and Opoeletronic Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China

Received date: 2019-04-13

  Online published: 2025-02-12

Fold

Abstract

Attitude determination technology is very important in many engineering applications, but the performance of common attitude algorithms in different situations has not been systematically studied. In this paper, comprehensive coning-motion simulation experiments are conducted for four common high-precision attitude algorithms. The accuracies of the four under different conditions are compared, and the attitude-angle error models of the four within a certain application range are established. Both the experimental results and the error models show that the accuracy order of the four is different under different conditions and the four-subsample rotation-vector method owns the highest calculation speed and the best comprehensive performance in most cases.

Key words： attitude angle; quaternion; four-subsample rotation vector; fourth order Runge-Kutta; Taylor series; error model; coning motion

Cite this article

XIONG Lijuan , ZHU Hongtao , WANG Zhiyong , CAO Juanhua , ZHOU Bo . Comparison and Error Modeling of Several Attitude Algorithms Under Coning Motion[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2020 , 40(3) : 39 -44 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2020.03.010

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
TITTERTON D H, WESTON J L. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology[M]. 2nd ed. Reston: AIAA Inc.,2004:16-25.

[2]
BACHMANN E R, MCGHEE R B, YUN X P, et al. Inertial and magnetic posture tracking for inserting humans into networked virtual environments[C]// SHAW Chris,WANG Wenping. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2001: 9-16.

[3]
ONUNKA C, BRIGHT G, STOPFORTH R. USV attitude estimation: an approach using quaternion in direction cosine matrix[J]. Robotica, 2016, 34(5): 995-1009.

[4]
SAMANI M, TESHNIZI M M. Convergence evaluation of quaternion-based attitude estimation using MEMS sensors[J]. International Journal of Space Science and Engineering, 2016, 4(1): 18.

[5]
IGNAGNI M B. Efficient class of optimized coning compensation algorithms[J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1996, 19(2): 424-429.

[6]
LU Tianyu, WU Xiaosheng, LEI Juanmian, et al. Numerical study on the aerodynamic coupling effects of spinning and coning motions for a finned vehicle[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77: 399-408.

[7]
LEE J G, MARK Y G, TAZARTES D A, et al. Extension of strapdown attitude algorithm for high-frequency base motion[J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1988, 13(4): 738-743.

[8]
LIU Yicheng, NING Zhou, TAO Zhang, et al. Robust attitude tracking based on rotation vector[J]. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2018, 6(4): 1608-1616.

[9]
ZHANG Xin, YU Lan. Comparative research on attitude algorithm of the Multi-Rotor UAV based on the gyroscope[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 6511/652/653: 668-671.

[10]
MILLER R B. A new strap down attitude algorithm[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1983, 6(4): 287-291.

[11]
靳聪, 赵修斌, 许云达, 等. 捷联姿态解算五子样等效旋转矢量算法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(29):96-99.

[12]
何矞, 任凯升, 南英. 捷联惯导姿态更新的六子样旋转矢量优化算法研究[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 22(2):35-38.

[13]
LI Lianpeng, XIE Lun, SU Zhong. Research on optimal eight-sample rotation vector algorithm for SINS attitude updating[J]. Journal of Computers, 2018, 29(2): 136-144.

[14]
李庆扬, 王能超, 易大义. 数值分析[M]. 4版. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2006:73-86.

[15]
项凤涛, 王正志, 吴第旻, 等. 捷联系统四元数姿态解算的精细积分法[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2010, 31(5):103-106.

[16]
华宇清, 于国宏. 捷联系统姿态算法比较及研究[J]. 航天控制, 1995(3):10-16.

[17]
张灵利, 苏宛新, 李雪雷, 等. 捷联惯导两种姿态算法抗干扰性能比较[J]. 长春工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 33(6):629-632.

[18]
刘志平. 无陀螺捷联惯导系统若干关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2010.

[19]
孙冬梅, 田增山, 韩令军. 捷联惯导系统中四元素法求解姿态角仿真模拟[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2009, 29(1):51-53.

[20]
康帅, 庞华伟, 周伟林. 捷联惯导系统中一种高精度姿态更新算法的推证[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2004, 24(5): 69-73.

[21]
SAVAGE P G. Coning algorithm design by explicit frequency shaping[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(4): 1123-1132.

[22]
KANG C W, PPARK C G, CHO N I. Approach to direct coning/sculling error compensation based on the sinusoidal modeling of IMU signal[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2013, 7(5): 527-534.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]