Evaluation of Mobile Navigation Support Capability by Improving Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process

WU Beiping; HE Jing; WANG Yanying; WANG Xiaowei

doi:10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2024.01.012

Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue 1: 75 - 83

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2024.01.012

Evaluation of Mobile Navigation Support Capability by Improving Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process

WU Beiping ¹^,² ,
HE Jing ¹ ,
WANG Yanying ¹ ,
WANG Xiaowei ¹

Expand

¹ Information and Navigation School, Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710077, Shaanxi,China
² Air Force Communication Noncommissioned Officer School, Dalian 116600,Liaoning,China

Received date: 2023-12-25

Online published: 2024-12-28

Fold

Abstract

In response to the uncertainty and maneuverability of future battlefield styles and forms, the rapid deployment needs of airports are becoming increasingly urgent. Mobile navigation support forces, as an essential component of aircraft takeoff and landing support, directly affect and restrict the combat capabilities of aviation forces in terms of speed and maneuverability. In response to the uncertainty characteristics of "small data" and "poor information" in the evaluation of mobile navigation support capabilities, the article comprehensively considers equipment and environmental factors under mobile deployment conditions, as well as the ability requirements of navigation support personnel. A mobile navigation support capability evaluation index system is established, and an improved grey analytic hierarchy process based mobile navigation support evaluation method is proposed. An evaluation model is constructed to reduce the influence of subjective factors, Starting from expert rating data, apply the 3-scale method to construct a judgment matrix, and refine the differentiation between qualitative and quantitative indicators to construct an evaluation sample matrix. Finally, the evaluation method is validated through examples. The results show that using the improved 3-scale grey analytic hierarchy process, the construction of the judgment matrix does not require consistency testing. While simplifying the evaluation calculation steps, it overcomes the complexity of external influencing factors, the ambiguity of subjective judgments, and the randomness of human scoring in the evaluation. When using this method in the next step, it can also increase the gray class level in the application of grey theory and improve the accuracy of evaluation.

Key words： navigation; gray level; supportability; evaluation

Cite this article

WU Beiping , HE Jing , WANG Yanying , WANG Xiaowei . Evaluation of Mobile Navigation Support Capability by Improving Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2024 , 44(1) : 75 -83 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2024.01.012

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	郭伟, 黄之杰. 快速部署机场保障装备系统[M]. 北京: 蓝天出版社, 2014. GUO W, HUANG Z J. Rapid deployment of airport support equipment system[M]. Beijing: Blue Sky Publishing House, 2014.

[2]	任佳成, 徐成凯, 陈博, 等. 基于灰色-层次分析法的装备保障效能评估[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2018, 41(5): 31-34. REN J C, XU C K, CHEN B, et al. Evaluation of equipment support efficiency based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Ship Electronic Countermeasures, 2018, 41(5): 31-34.

[3]	李金声, 程建, 黄涛, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的快速构建通信网络能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(7): 43-50. LI J S, CHENG J, HUANG T, et al. Rapid construction of communication network capability evaluation based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2022, 47(7): 43-50.

[4]	胡昌栋, 滑楠, 岳地久, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的机动通信系统效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45(11): 106-112. HU C D, HUA N, YUE D J, et al. Efficiency evaluation of mobile communication systems based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2020, 45(11): 106-112.

[5]	罗乐, 李钟敏, 夏斌, 等. 灰色层次分析GAHP的通指系统作战效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39(2): 86-89. LUO L, LI Z M, XIA B, et al. Grey analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) for evaluating the operational effectiveness of general instructional systems[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2014, 39(2): 86-89.

[6]	杨勇, 吴洋. 基于灰色层次分析法的察打型无人机作战能力评估[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2014, 34(7): 134-137. YANG Y, WU Y. Evaluation of combat capability of chada type unmanned aerial vehicles based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Ship Electronics Engineering, 2014, 34(7): 134-137

[7]	赵悦岑, 娄文忠, 汪金奎, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的无人机回收系统评估[J]. 无人系统技术, 2019, 2(5): 56-62. ZHAO Y C, LOU W Z, WANG J K, et al. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle recycling system based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Unmanned System Technology, 2019, 2(5): 56-62

[8]	王晓红, 李龙, 王盛春, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的侦察无人机生存能力评估[J]. 兵工自动化, 2022, 41(2): 23-27. WANG X H, LI L, WANG S C, et al. Survival capability evaluation of reconnaissance drones based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Ordnance Automation, 2022, 41(2): 23-27.

[9]	赵丹玲. 基于异质网络的武器装备体系贡献率评估方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019. ZHAO D L. Research on the contribution rate evaluation method of weapon and equipment systems based on heterogeneous networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.

[10]	付东, 方程, 王震雷. 作战能力与作战效能评估方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2006, 20(4): 35-39. FU D, FANG C, WANG Z L. Research on evaluation methods of combat capability and combat effectiveness[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2006, 20(4): 35-39.

[11]	周华任, 张晟, 穆松, 等. 综合评价方法及其军事应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2015. ZHOU H R, ZHANG S, MU S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation methods and their military applications[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2015.

[12]	王晨, 谢文俊, 毛声, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的多种载荷侦察效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2017, 42(10): 177-182. WANG C, XIE W J, MAO S, et al. Evaluation of multiple load reconnaissance effectiveness based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2017, 42(10): 177-182.

[13]	马国普. 基于非战争军事行动应对重大突发事件的方法[M]. 广州: 世界图书出版社, 2015. MA G P. Methods for responding to major emergencies based on non war military operations[M]. Guangzhou: World Book Publishing House, 2015.

[14]	刘思峰. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021. LIU S F. Grey system theory and its applications[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.

[15]	易平涛, 李伟伟, 郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法[M]. 北京: 经理管理出版社, 2019. YI P T, LI W W, GUO Y J. Comprehensive evaluation theory and methods[M]. Beijing: Manager Management Press, 2019.

[16]	刘玉玲, 游春. 改进的层次分析法在公路隧道施工安全评价中的应用[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2009, 16(3): 75-78. LIU Y L, YOU C. Application of improved analytic hierarchy process in safety evaluation of highway tunnel construction[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2009, 16(3): 75-78.

[17]	王兵玲. 基于灰色理论的AIS与雷达信息融合的研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2010. WANG B L. Research on the fusion of ais and radar information based on grey theory[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2010.

[18]	张馨予, 胡冰, 张逸楠, 等. 基于改进Grey-AHP的雷达装备维修性评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(5): 78-87. DOI ZHANG X Y, HU B, ZHANG Y N, et al. A maintenance evaluation method for radar equipment based on improved grey AHP[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2021, 49(5): 78-87.

[19]	WEN K L. The grey system analysis and its application in gas breakdown and VAR compensator finding(invited paper)[J]. International journal of computational cognition, 2004, 2(1): 21-44.

[20]	王增飞, 刘增勇. 基于熵权修正AHP的新装备保障能力模糊综合评价[J]. 军事交通学报, 2022, 1(7): 25-31. WANG Z F, LIU Z Y. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of new equipment support capability based on entropy weight modified AHP[J]. Journal of Military Transportation, 2022, 1(7): 25-31.

[21]	徐雪飞, 李建华, 崔琼, 等. 基于灰色层次法的频率干扰修复系统作战效能评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2016, 23(1): 48-52. XU X F, LI J H, CUI Q, et al. Evaluation of operational efficiency of frequency interference repair system based on grey hierarchy process[J]. Electro Optics and Control, 2016, 23(1): 48-52.

[22]	邓资文, 陈智, 马幸, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的航天搜救行动能力评估[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2021, 41(6): 124-127. DENG Z W, CHEN Z, MA X, et al. Evaluation of aerospace search and rescue operations capability based on grey analytic hierarchy process[J]. Ship Electronics Engineering, 2021, 41(6): 124-127.

Options

Outlines