[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Process and Characteristics of Pressure Building in Cavity under High-speed Flow

  • XIONG Wenjing 1 ,
  • FU Debin 1 ,
  • SHEN Li 2
Expand
  • 1 School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institution of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2 Navigation and Control Technology Research Institute, China Ordnance Industry Group, Beijing 100176, China

Received date: 2023-10-12

  Online published: 2024-12-28

Abstract

The evolution of internal pressure within a cavity with pores under the action of high-speed inflow has significant implications for the separation of missile nose cones, the shedding of fairings, and the opening of hatch doors. Around the cavity structure featuring inlet pores and outlet pores, theoretical and numerical models have been established to predict changes in cavity pressure. These models, combined with experimental validation, have been used to investigate the effects of pore location, inlet and outlet area, and cavity volume on the pressurization process within the cavity. The results indicate that the position and size of the exhaust pores have a significant impact on the pressurization effectiveness of the cavity. With an air intake to outlet area ratio of 0.75, pores in the windward area of the cavity can enhance the pressurization rate during the initial phase. However, in the steady state, as the pores transition from intake to exhaust, the pressure within the cavity decreases by approximately 39% compared to the condition without outlet pores. The pressure changes in the cavity are more complex in areas where the surface slope transitions influenced by the evolution of flow patterns, leading to a reduction to 50% of the pressure in the absence of exhaust in the steady state. When the pores are located at the rear of the cavity, the pressure during the steady state is the lowest, approximately 44% of that in the non-exhaust condition. Meanwhile, an increase in the inlet area significantly raises the cavity pressure, while an increase in the area of the exhaust pores lowers the cavity pressure and reduces the time required for pressurization. The volume of the cavity has a certain effect on the rate of pressurization but has a minimal impact on the final pressurization outcome.

Cite this article

XIONG Wenjing , FU Debin , SHEN Li . Process and Characteristics of Pressure Building in Cavity under High-speed Flow[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2024 , 44(2) : 1 -6 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2024.02.001

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
LI Y, EGGERS T, REIMANN B. A dynamics study for the hot stage separation of a multistage rocket with a coupled CFD flight mechanics approach: AIAA 2012-5820[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2012.

[2]
庞川博, 向玉伟, 马兴普, 等. 高超声速导弹进气道整流罩分离气动特性研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2020, 40(3): 123-128.

PANG C B, XIANG Y W, MA X P, et al. Research on aerodynamic characteristics of inlet fairing separation from a hypersonic missile[J]. Journa of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2020, 40(3): 123-128.

[3]
BAKER W, KEEN S, MORGRET C. Validation of weapon separation predictions using F/A-22 flight test results: AIAA 2004-6803[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.

[4]
DIETZ W E. Simulation and analysis of multiple-body dispense event: AIAA 2004-1252[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.

[5]
宋威, 艾邦成. 多体空气动力学研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 54(6): 1461-1484.

SONG W, AI B C. Multibody separation dynamics: Review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 54(6): 1461-1484.

[6]
STALLINGS R L, WILCOX F J. Experimental cavity pressure distributions at supersonic speeds: NASA-TP-2683[R]. Washington: NASA, 1987.

[7]
张俊祥, 冯金富, 于心一, 等. 一种改善内埋式弹舱气流特性的方法[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2011, 31(6): 165-168.

ZHANG J X, FENG J F, YU X Y, et al. A new method for improving cavity flow[J]. Journa of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2011, 31(6): 165-168.

[8]
RAMAMURTHI K, NANDAKUMAR K. Characteristics of flow through small sharp-edged cylindrical orifices[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1999, 10(3): 133-143.

[9]
WU P K, MIRANDA R F, FAETH G M. Effects of initial flow conditions on primary breakup of nonturbulent and turbulent round liquid jets[J]. Atomization and Sprays, 1995, 5(2): 175-196.

[10]
TASLIM M E, UGARTE S. Discharge coefficient measurements for flow through compound-angle conical holes with cross-flow[J]. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2004, 10: 145-153.

[11]
JAFARI M, PARHIZKAR H, GHASEMLU S. Simulation of strap-on boosters separation in the atmosphere[J]. International Journal of Engineering, 2015, 28(2): 164-171.

[12]
TUCKER P G. Advanced computational fluid and aerodynamics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

[13]
CUI P, JIA H, CHEN J, et al. Numerical investigation on unsteady shock wave/vortex/turbulent boundary layer interactions of a hypersonic vehicle during its shroud separation[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(10): 619-627.

[14]
FU D, CHEW J W, SUN Z. Velocity pick-up and discharge coefficient for round orifices with cross flow at inlet[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2014, 228(15): 2728-2737.

Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]