[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >
Airfoil Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Surrogate Model and Deep Reinforcement Learning
Received date: 2025-04-07
Online published: 2025-11-28
To enhance the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL), a DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models is proposed. Deep reinforcement learning suffers from low sample efficiency, in aerodynamic optimization, it requires extensive use of flow field numerical simulations to obtain sample data. However, high-precision flow field numerical simulations come with a substantial computational cost in terms of time. By introducing surrogate models, it can rapidly generate sample data, reduce the dependence on high-precision flow field numerical simulations, and improve the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization. Taking the transonic airfoil drag reduction optimization design and inverse design as examples, the effectiveness of the DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models is analyzed. In transonic airfoil drag reduction optimization design, both DRL and DRL based on surrogate models achieve optimal solutions, eliminate the shock waves. However, the use of surrogate models reduces the number of high-precision flow field numerical simulations by 67%, significantly improving optimization efficiency. In airfoil inverse design, the pressure distribution and shape of the inversely designed airfoil obtained through DRL based on surrogate models show good agreement with the target airfoil. Both examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed DRL-based aerodynamic optimization framework incorporating surrogate models.
REN Kai , SHI Yongbing , BU Yuepeng , ZHANG Yang , TONG Jing , TIAN Siyuan . Airfoil Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Surrogate Model and Deep Reinforcement Learning[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2025 , 45(5) : 878 -886 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.05.032
| [1] |
林杰, 唐志共, 钱炜祺, 等. 飞行器生成式气动设计研究进展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(10): 631679.
|
| [2] |
韩忠华, 高正红, 宋文萍, 等. 翼型研究的历史、现状与未来发展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(6): 1-36.
|
| [3] |
夏陈超. 基于CFD的飞行器高保真度气动外形优化设计方法[D]. 浙江: 浙江大学, 2016.
|
| [4] |
韩忠华, 许晨舟, 乔建领, 等. 基于代理模型的高效全局气动优化设计方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(05): 30-70.
|
| [5] |
唐志共, 朱林阳, 向星皓, 等. 智能空气动力学若干研究进展及展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(7): 1-35.
|
| [6] |
张伟伟, 寇家庆, 刘溢浪. 智能赋能流体力学展望[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(04):26-71.
|
| [7] |
吴智, 范德威, 周裕. 人工智能控制湍流进展: 系统、算法、成就、数据分析方法[J]. 力学进展, 2023, 53(2): 273-307.
|
| [8] |
张天姣, 钱炜祺, 周宇, 等. 人工智能与空气动力学结合的初步思考[J]. 航空工程进展, 2019, 10(1): 1-11.
|
| [9] |
陈海昕, 邓凯文, 李润泽. 机器学习技术在气动优化中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(01):52-68.
|
| [10] |
孙刚, 王聪, 王立悦, 等. 人工智能在气动设计中的应用与展望[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2021(03): 1-9+147.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
李润泽, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. 针对超临界翼型气动修型策略的强化学习[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(04):275-288.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
张峻伟, 吕帅, 张正昊, 等. 基于样本效率优化的深度强化学习方法综述[J]. 软件学报, 2022, 33(11): 4217-4238.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |