[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >
Aerodynamic Heat Prediction and Experimental Analysis of High-Speed Rocket Sleds
Received date: 2025-05-20
Online published: 2026-01-24
Aerodynamic heat research plays a crucial role in rocket sled testing,providing essential support for structural design and ensuring safety and reliability during high-speed operation.This paper focuses on the impact of spatial discretization schemes,turbulence models,and the height of the first normal grid layer on aerodynamic heat calculation results.Using a simplified model of typical a high-speed rocket sled,detailed aerodynamic heat calculations were conducted.The study analyzed the heat flux distribution at key locations on the sled body,revealing the interference mechanisms caused by track-reflected shock waves and fairings on the side of the vehicle.In addition,this paper conducts a quantitative analysis of the consistency between simulation and experimental results based on data from a single-track rocket sled test.The results indicate that:(1) For aerodynamic heat prediction in rocket sled,the Roe scheme is recommended for spatial discretization,the S-A model is preferred for turbulence modeling,and the height of the first normal grid layer should not exceed 1×10-7m; (2) In the typical sled body,the peak heat flux in interference-free areas reaches 24050kW/m2,primarily concentrated in the connecting section.Interference are formed on the lower half of the conical section due to track-reflected shock waves,and significant interference is observed on the vehicle’s side due to the fairing,both of which lead to a substantial increase in local heat flux; (3) The maximum deviation between the simulated and experimental temperature results is 17.88%,demonstrating that the numerical method can be used for subsequent aerodynamic heat prediction of rocket sleds.The findings of this study provide important theoretical support for the engineering application of rocket sled testing.
ZHOU Xuewen , ZHANG Chenhui , LV Shuiyan , LIU Jin , BA Weitao . Aerodynamic Heat Prediction and Experimental Analysis of High-Speed Rocket Sleds[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2025 , 45(6) : 1310 -1317 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.06.043
| [1] |
景建斌, 赵卫星. 火箭橇试验[J]. 测试技术学报, 2012,26:82-91.
|
| [2] |
张晨辉, 杨洋, 杨珍, 等. 火箭橇试验无扰动分离技术[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2021, 41(02):47-50.
|
| [3] |
夏有财, 孔维红, 孙其会, 等. 两级推进单轨火箭橇试验研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(03):489-495.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
赵项伟, 杨珍, 杨洋. 火箭橇靴轨接触特性数值分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(1):238-243.
|
| [7] |
范孝华, 唐志共, 王刚, 等. 激波/湍流边界层干扰低频非定常性研究评述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1):625917.
|
| [8] |
赵雄飞, 吴国东, 王志军, 等. 超高速弹丸气动热的数值模拟[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2017, 37(2):108-110.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
王庆洋, 丛堃林, 刘丽丽, 等. 临近空间高超声速飞行器气动力及气动热研究现状[J]. 气体物理, 2017, 2(4):46-55.
|
| [11] |
彭治雨, 石义雷, 龚红明, 等. 高超声速气动热预测技术及发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(1):325-345.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
赵卫星, 余远锋, 闫华东. 高超声速火箭橇气动热理论分析[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 042(S2):154-158,196.
|
| [14] |
王志超, 张龙, 姚琳. 高速飞行器结构气动热计算与温度场模拟[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2015, 36(11):49-52.
|
| [15] |
陈鑫, 刘莉, 李昱霖, 等. 高超声速飞行器翼面气动加热的工程计算方法[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2013, 33(03):133-137.
|
| [16] |
张石玉, 赵俊波, 付增良, 等. 类F-16飞行器风洞虚拟飞行试验研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(1):49-54.
|
| [17] |
朱广生, 聂春生, 曹占伟, 等. 气动热环境试验及测量技术研究进展[J]. 实验流体力学, 2019, 33(02):1-10.
|
| [18] |
张翔. 高超声速飞行器气动热数值模拟及优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2022.
|
| [19] |
薛青. 高超声速火箭气动加热数值计算方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2009.
|
| [20] |
吕水燕, 张传侠, 叶坤, 等. 高超声速气动热数值模拟的网格模式相关性研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2019, 40(03):82-86.
|
| [21] |
吕水燕, 谢波涛, 任引艾, 等. 高超声速二维滑靴热-固耦合仿真[J]. 测试技术学报, 2014, 28(01):84-87.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |