Study on Low Energy Impact Resistance of Two Kinds of Star-shaped Honeycomb Sandwich Panels

JI Guoming; LI Yixing; HAN Qing; WANG Ruiwen

doi:10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.01.013

Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance >

2025 , Vol. 45 >Issue 1: 93 - 100

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.01.013

Study on Low Energy Impact Resistance of Two Kinds of Star-shaped Honeycomb Sandwich Panels

JI Guoming ^,¹^,² ,
LI Yixing ¹ ,
HAN Qing ¹^,² ,
WANG Ruiwen ¹

Expand

¹ School of Aviation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072,Shaanxi, China
² National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Xi'an 710072,Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2024-03-14

Online published: 2025-03-12

Fold

Abstract

In order to study the low energy impact resistance of re-entrant star-shaped (RES) and re-entrant circular star-shaped (RECS) honeycomb sandwich panels with negative Poisson ratio, a finite element model of honeycomb sandwich panels with composite laminates and ABS honeycomb is established by using commercial software ANSYS/LS-DYNA. Impact response of the composite sandwich panels with RES honeycomb and RECS honeycomb is analyzed numerically at low impact energies of 10 J,15 J,30 J. In this paper, the impactor displacement versus time curves、contact force versus time curves and energy absorption ratio of sandwich panels under different impact conditions are analyzed and compared. The simulation results show that under the same impact conditions, the damage depth of RECS honeycomb sandwich panels is greater than that of RES honeycomb sandwich panels, and the difference is more obvious when under in-plane impact. In addition, the impactor has a lower rebound speed after impacting RECS honeycomb sandwich panels, that is, the RECS honeycomb sandwich panel has a higher energy absorption ratio. According to the above results, it is concluded that RES honeycomb sandwich panel has better low energy impact resistance than RECS honeycomb sandwich panel, but the latter has better energy absorption performance.

Key words： star-shaped honeycomb; low energy impact; negative Poisson ratio; sandwich panel

Cite this article

JI Guoming , LI Yixing , HAN Qing , WANG Ruiwen . Study on Low Energy Impact Resistance of Two Kinds of Star-shaped Honeycomb Sandwich Panels[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2025 , 45(1) : 93 -100 . DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2025.01.013

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	YAN L L, ZHU K Y, CHEN N, et al. Energy-absorption characteristics of tube-reinforced absorbent honeycomb sandwich structure[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 255: 112946.

[2]	周楠. S型碳纤维褶皱夹芯结构抗冲击性能研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2022. ZHOU N. Research on impact resistance of S-shaped carbon-fiber foldcore sandwich structure[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2022.

[3]	刘宝君. 金属蜂窝夹芯板力热耦合作用下的数值模拟[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2011. LIU B J. The simulation of metal honeycomb sandwich panel under thermomechanical coupling[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2011.

[4]	LI X L, LI Z Z, GUO Z Y, et al. A novel star-shaped honeycomb with enhanced energy absorption[J]. Composite Structures, 2023, 309: 116716.

[5]	LU H, WANG X P, CHEN T N. In-plane dynamics crushing of a combined auxetic honeycomb with negative Poisson's ratio and enhanced energy absorption[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 160: 107366.

[6]	LAKES R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson's ratio[J]. Science, 1987, 235(4792): 1038-1040. PMID

[7]	李斌, 付涛. 星型负泊松比蜂窝夹层板的低速冲击动态响应分析[J]. 振动工程学报: 2024, 37(1):1925-1935. LI B, FU T. Low-speed impact dynamic response analysis of honeycomb sandwich panels with negative Poisson ratio[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering: 2024, 37(1):1925-1935.

[8]	UL H A, GUNASHEKAR G, NARALA S K R. The dynamic response of auxhex and star-reentrant honeycomb cored sandwich panels subject to blast loading[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2023, 48(9): 11771-11755.

[9]	SHAO Y J, MENG J X, MA G H, et al. Insight into the negative Poisson's ratio effect of the gradient auxetic reentrant honeycombs[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 274: 114366.

[10]	吴雄, 李应刚, 肖雯, 等. 浮冰碰撞下蜂窝金属夹芯板动态响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(16):204-209. WU X, LI Y G, XIAO W, et al. Dynamic responses of a honeycomb sandwich plate under ice floe impact[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(16):204-209.

[11]	LI J F, ZHANG W, WANG Z P, et al. Dynamic response and failure of CFRP Kagome lattice core sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2023, 181: 104737.

[12]	黄贵宾, 段玥晨, 谢鑫. 冲击角度对Nomex蜂窝夹芯板低速平头冲击响应的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022(10):25-32. DOI HUANG G B, DUAN Y C, XIE X. Research on low speed flat head impact performance of Nomex honeycomb sandwich panel[J]. Composite Materials and Engineering, 2022(10): 25-32.

[13]	USTA F, TÜRKMEN H S, SCARPA F. High-velocity impact resistance of doubly curved sandwich panels with re-entrant honeycomb and foam core[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 165: 104230.

[14]	KHAIRE N, TIWARI G, RATHOD S, et al. Perforation and energy dissipation behaviour of honeycomb core cylindrical sandwich shell subjected to conical shape projectile at high velocity impact[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 171: 108724.

[15]	UDE A U, ARIFFIN A K, AZHARI C H. Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 58: 31-38.

[16]	SUN M Q, WOWK D, MECHEFSKE C, et al. Surface and honeycomb core damage in adhesively bonded aluminum sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 230: 109506.

[17]	LIN G J, LI J Q, LI F, et al. Low-velocity impact response of sandwich composite panels with shear thickening gel filled honeycomb cores[J]. Composites Communications, 2022, 32: 101136.

[18]	张苗苗. 3D打印纤维增强复合材料蜂窝结构设计及性能研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022. ZHANG M M. Research on structure design and properties of honeycomb based on 3D-printed fiber reinforced composites[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2022.

[19]	QUAN C, HAN B, HOU Z H, et al. 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite auxetic honeycomb structures[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 187: 107858.

[20]	DOU H, YE W G, ZHANG D H, et al. Research on drop-weight impact of continuous carbon fiber reinforced 3D printed honeycomb structure[J]. Materials Today Communications, 2021, 29: 102869.

[21]	周明安, 徐雪雅. 应用于3D打印技术的ABS/纳米二氧化钛复合材料制备及力学性能研究[J]. 塑料工业, 2020, 48(4):124-129. ZHOU M A, XU X Y. Research on fabrication and mechanical properties of ABS with TiO₂ nanoparticles applied to 3D printing technology[J]. China Plastics Industry, 2020, 48(4):124-129.

[22]	LOBDELL M, CROOP B, LOBO H. Comparison of crash models for ductile plastics[C]// Proceedings of the 10th European LS-DYNA Conference,Wurzburg:[s.n.], 2015: 1-8.

[23]	CHANG F K, CHANG K Y. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1987, 21(9): 834-855.

[24]	FERABOLI P, WADE B, DELEO F, et al. LS-DYNA MAT54 modeling of the axial crushing of a composite tape sinusoidal specimen[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42(11): 1809-1825.

[25]	陈鹏宇. 内凹弧形蜂窝夹芯板抗弹性能试验与数值仿真[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022. CHEN P Y. Test and numerical simulation on ballistic impact resistance of re-entrant circular honeycomb sandwich panel[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2022.

[26]	DOGAN F, HADAVINIA H, DONCHEV T, et al. Delamination of impacted composite structures by cohesive zone interface elements and tiebreak contact[J]. Central European Journal of Engineering, 2012, 2: 612-626.

[27]	ÖZEN İ, ÇAVA K, GEDIKLI H, et al. Low-energy impact response of composite sandwich panels with thermoplastic honeycomb and reentrant cores[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 156: 106989.

Options

Outlines